Argumental calamity in the process of devotional service: Difference between revisions
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div id="compilation"> | |||
<div id="facts"> | |||
{{terms|"argumental calamity in the process of devotional service"}} | {{terms|"argumental calamity in the process of devotional service"}} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Arguments in Devotional Service to God]] | ||
[[Category:Calamities]] | [[Category:Calamities in Devotional Service to God]] | ||
[[Category:Process]] | [[Category:Process of Devotional Service to God]] | ||
</div> | |||
<div class="section" id="Lectures" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2></div> | |||
== Lectures | <div class="sub_section" id="Nectar_of_Devotion_Lectures" text="Nectar of Devotion Lectures"><h3>Nectar of Devotion Lectures</h3></div> | ||
<div class="quote" book="Lec" link="The Nectar of Devotion — Vṛndāvana, October 27, 1972" link_text="The Nectar of Devotion — Vṛndāvana, October 27, 1972"> | |||
<div class="heading">Sometimes these logicians, they create argumental calamity in the process of devotional service.</div> | |||
< | <div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:The Nectar of Devotion — Vṛndāvana, October 27, 1972|The Nectar of Devotion — Vṛndāvana, October 27, 1972]]:''' So to take shelter of the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead... Just like Rūpa Gosvāmī's described, describing herewith that he wants to take shelter of the ocean, deep into the ocean, and he doesn't care for the rivers. And the, what is called? Bharavagni (?)? There is some whirling pool in the water. That is compared with the arguments. Sometimes these logicians, they create argumental calamity in the process of devotional service. But Rūpa Gosvāmī recommends that we should not be deviated by the arguments, karmīs, jñānīs and yogis. Let them do their own business. We do not care for them. We give them respect as far as possible, but we don't, don't accept the path of karma-jñāna-yoga. Jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam [Cc. Madhya 19.167]. Jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam. Anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam [Brs. 1.1.11]. We should not be deviated by the process of karma-jñāna-yoga. That is pure devotional service, śuddha-bhakti. Śuddha-bhakti. We should stay. We should fix up in śuddha-bhakti path. That is the recommendation of Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī.</div> | ||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 16:36, 2 December 2018
Lectures
Nectar of Devotion Lectures
Sometimes these logicians, they create argumental calamity in the process of devotional service.
The Nectar of Devotion — Vṛndāvana, October 27, 1972: So to take shelter of the lotus feet of the Supreme Personality of Godhead... Just like Rūpa Gosvāmī's described, describing herewith that he wants to take shelter of the ocean, deep into the ocean, and he doesn't care for the rivers. And the, what is called? Bharavagni (?)? There is some whirling pool in the water. That is compared with the arguments. Sometimes these logicians, they create argumental calamity in the process of devotional service. But Rūpa Gosvāmī recommends that we should not be deviated by the arguments, karmīs, jñānīs and yogis. Let them do their own business. We do not care for them. We give them respect as far as possible, but we don't, don't accept the path of karma-jñāna-yoga. Jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam [Cc. Madhya 19.167]. Jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam. Anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam [Brs. 1.1.11]. We should not be deviated by the process of karma-jñāna-yoga. That is pure devotional service, śuddha-bhakti. Śuddha-bhakti. We should stay. We should fix up in śuddha-bhakti path. That is the recommendation of Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī.