User contributions for Purnamasi
4 May 2024
- 11:4911:49, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Herein (SB 7.11.35) it is clearly stated by Narada Muni that one should not be accepted as a brahmana, ksatriya, vaisya or sudra according to birth, for although this is going on now, it is not accepted by the sastras No edit summary current
- 11:3711:37, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Blind men may lead many other blind followers without true knowledge of material conditions, but they are not accepted by devotees like Prahlada Maharaja No edit summary current
- 11:3511:35, 4 May 2024 diff hist −44 A Krsna conscious person should not be disturbed whether his preaching work is being accepted by the people or not No edit summary current
- 11:3411:34, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 A Krsna conscious person should not be disturbed whether his preaching work is being accepted by the people or not No edit summary
- 11:2811:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 As such, the argument of the Mayavadi philosophers that this world is false is not accepted by the Vaisnava philosophers No edit summary current
- 11:2711:27, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 An ordinary man not supported by authorized statements of the sastras and acaryas should not be accepted as an incarnation or devotee No edit summary
- 11:2611:26, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 An occupational duty of the brahmana is to teach Vedic knowledge, but unless there is an emergency, this professional duty should not be accepted by the ksatriyas, vaisyas or sudras No edit summary
- 11:2311:23, 4 May 2024 diff hist +46 Anything not given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead is not accepted by the Bhagavat school as religion. In the beginning of SB it is said, Dharmah projita kaitavo. This kaitavo religion means cheating religion No edit summary current
- 11:1711:17, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 Although brahmajyoti is not different from His (the Supreme Person) personal body, that sort of oneness (merging into the bodily luster of the Personality of Godhead) is not accepted by a pure devotee No edit summary current
- 11:1411:14, 4 May 2024 diff hist +33 The modern theory that starvation is due to an increase in population is not accepted by the demigods or the devotees of the Lord No edit summary current
- 11:1311:13, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 The modern theory that starvation is due to an increase in population is not accepted by the demigods or the devotees of the Lord No edit summary
- 11:1111:11, 4 May 2024 diff hist +45 In this conception (of pancopasana) the impersonalists imagine one of these five deities (Visnu, Siva etc.) as supreme and reject the others. Such philosophical speculation, which is certainly idol worship, is not accepted by Sri Caitanya or by Vaisnavas No edit summary current
- 10:5110:51, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Category:Real Fight No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 10:4610:46, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 The real fighting is now. Krsna will give you all protection. So, chant Hare Krsna and fight. One movie expert has opined there are so many ideas in our movement. Try to get our ideas into movies No edit summary
- 10:4310:43, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 The brainwash books are already there. Even if they stop externally, internally it will go on. Our first class campaign is book distribution. Go house to house. The real fighting is now. Krsna will give you all protection No edit summary
- 10:3910:39, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Real religious fighting No edit summary current
- 10:3410:34, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Our fight is for this purpose, no more death. This is real fight. Your, what is your fight? You may save yourself for two years or three years or ten years, but you have to die. You have no such program not to die. But here is a program, no more death No edit summary
- 10:3010:30, 4 May 2024 diff hist +25 Fight on the principle of religion. That is real fight. Otherwise fight whimsically, that is animals' fight, cats' and dogs' fight No edit summary
- 10:2810:28, 4 May 2024 diff hist 0 A ksatriya is profited, either dead or alive. That will be explained. Because in a fighting, I mean to say, real religious fighting, on principle it is a ksatriya is not responsible for killing No edit summary current
- 10:2710:27, 4 May 2024 diff hist +1 A ksatriya is profited, either dead or alive. That will be explained. Because in a fighting, I mean to say, real religious fighting, on principle it is a ksatriya is not responsible for killing No edit summary
- 10:2610:26, 4 May 2024 diff hist +23 A ksatriya is profited, either dead or alive. That will be explained. Because in a fighting, I mean to say, real religious fighting, on principle it is a ksatriya is not responsible for killing No edit summary
- 10:2210:22, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Arjuna was Krsna's friend, but He never said that "You stop your working." Rather, He engaged him in his real work. He was a fighter No edit summary
- 10:2010:20, 4 May 2024 diff hist 0 Arjuna, while fighting on the Battlefield of Kuruksetra, was not really fighting at all; he was simply carrying out the orders of Krsna in full Krsna consciousness. Such a person is never entangled in the reactions of work. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:1610:16, 4 May 2024 diff hist +24 Arjuna, while fighting on the Battlefield of Kuruksetra, was not really fighting at all; he was simply carrying out the orders of Krsna in full Krsna consciousness. Such a person is never entangled in the reactions of work. BG 1972 purports No edit summary
1 May 2024
- 11:0611:06, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Yamunakarsana-lila is the pastime of attracting the Yamuna. One day, Sri Baladeva wanted the Yamuna River to come before Him, and when the river Yamuna refused, He took His plow, wanting to dig a canal so that the Yamuna would be obliged to come there No edit summary current
- 11:0211:02, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 These calves were grown up, but still the mothers wanted to feed them. Therefore Balarama was a little surprised, and He wanted to inquire from Krsna about the reason for their behavior No edit summary
- 11:0111:01, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Sri Baladeva was very angry at Arjuna (for kidnapping Subhadra), and He wanted to kill him, but Lord Krsna implored His brother to excuse Arjuna No edit summary
- 11:0011:00, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Lord Balarama wanted to impress upon Rukmini that she should not be sorry for the consequences her brother (Rukmi) suffered due to his actions. There was no need of being too affectionate toward such a brother No edit summary
- 10:5710:57, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Lord Balarama, of course, could understand the ecstatic feelings of the gopis, and therefore He wanted to pacify them No edit summary current
- 10:5510:55, 1 May 2024 diff hist 0 It is stated in Srimad-Bhagavatam (10.65.25-30, 33) that Lord Baladeva asked the Yamuna to come near, and when the river disobeyed the order of the Lord, He became angry and thus wanted to snatch her near to Him with His plow No edit summary
- 10:5510:55, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 It is stated in Srimad-Bhagavatam (10.65.25-30, 33) that Lord Baladeva asked the Yamuna to come near, and when the river disobeyed the order of the Lord, He became angry and thus wanted to snatch her near to Him with His plow No edit summary
- 10:5310:53, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 In this (yamunakarsana) lila, Baladeva was accompanied by His girlfriends. After drinking a honey beverage called Varuni, He wanted to jump into the Yamuna and swim with the girls No edit summary current
- 10:4810:48, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 In spite of this knowledge They (Krsna and Balarama) wanted to go to Hastinapura to take part in the bereavement. On arriving in Hastinapura, Krsna and Balarama first went to see Bhismadeva because he was the chief of the Kuru dynasty No edit summary current
- 10:4210:42, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 He (Balarama) was angry at Bhimasena when the latter struck Duryodhana on the thigh or below the belt, and He wanted to retaliate the unfair action No edit summary current
- 10:3910:39, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 He (Balarama) immediately wanted to scratch the land near the river with His plowshare (because Yamuna neglected His order) No edit summary current
- 10:3610:36, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 A ksatriya does not hesitate to kill his own brother. In other words, Balarama wanted to instruct Rukmini that Rukmi, Krsna were right in not showing mercy to each other in the fighting, despite family consideration, they happened to be brothers-in-law No edit summary
- 10:3010:30, 1 May 2024 diff hist +28 Category:Balarama Wants No edit summary Tag: Reverted
30 April 2024
- 14:0114:01, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 The miserable conditions of material life have been pointed out by Sri Krsna in the Bhagavad-gita. Krsna says that the problem of life is janma-mrtyu-jara-vyadhi (BG 13.9), meaning that birth, death, old age and disease No edit summary
- 13:5913:59, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 These sufferings (ultimate sufferings) are pointed out in Bhagavad-gita as janma-mrtyu-jara-vyadhi: (BG 13.9) birth, death, old age, and disease. What have we done to nullify these sufferings? There is no remedy for them in the material world No edit summary current
- 13:5713:57, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 There are so many commentators on Bhagavad-gita, but nobody has pointed out what is the real business of Bhagavad-gita No edit summary current
- 13:5513:55, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 Powerful nature can be pacified only by the awakening of God consciousness, as clearly pointed out in the Bhagavad-gita (7.14) No edit summary current
- 13:5413:54, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 Our own practical experience we have to accept the beginning of creation, and when we accept the beginning, we must accept a creator. Such a creator must possess an all-pervasive body, as pointed out in the Bhagavad-gita - 13.14 No edit summary current
- 13:5213:52, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 Category:Pointed Out in the Bhagavad-gita No edit summary current
- 13:5013:50, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 Foolish people, therefore, become devotees of demigods. This has been pointed out and criticized by Lord Krsna in Bhagavad-gita (BG 7.20): kamais tais tair hrta jnanah prapadyante 'nya-devatah No edit summary
- 13:4813:48, 30 April 2024 diff hist +46 A creator must possess an all-pervasive body, as pointed out in the Bhagavad-gita (3.14): Everywhere are His hands and legs, His eyes, heads and faces, and He has ears everywhere. In this way the Supersoul exists, pervading everything No edit summary current
- 13:4213:42, 30 April 2024 diff hist +42 What I want to do immediately are as follows: To hold consecutive meetings at different Mohallus & houses of Delhi for impressing the ideas of the mission. To give training to at least 7 to 10 educated young men in the parampara lessons of Bhagavad-gita No edit summary current Tag: Manual revert
- 13:4013:40, 30 April 2024 diff hist −42 What I want to do immediately are as follows: To hold consecutive meetings at different Mohallus & houses of Delhi for impressing the ideas of the mission. To give training to at least 7 to 10 educated young men in the parampara lessons of Bhagavad-gita No edit summary
- 13:3513:35, 30 April 2024 diff hist +42 We understand from the Bhagavad-gita, that it was first instructed to Surya. Imam vivasvate proktam (BG 4.1): "I first of all spoke this science to Vivasvan, Surya." Surya means sun-god. So nobody can trace out history when sun-god took the lessons No edit summary current
- 13:3213:32, 30 April 2024 diff hist +42 The Vedic literatures are taught in higher planets also, as there is reference in the Bhagavad-gita about the teachings to the sun-god (Vivasvan) by the Lord, and such lessons are transferred by disciplic succession No edit summary current
- 13:3013:30, 30 April 2024 diff hist +42 The lessons of the Bhagavad-gita and all the Puranas, specifically the Bhagavata Purana, are therefore inevitably connected with the history of the Pandava mahatmas. For them, separation from the Lord was just like the separation of a fish from water No edit summary