Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Is it clear?

Revision as of 05:43, 17 May 2010 by Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) (Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"is it clear"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Visnu Murti}} {{complete|}} {{goal|75}} {{first|17May10}} {{last|17May10}} {{totals_by_secti…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Expressions researched:
"is it clear"

Lectures

Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures

Lecture on BG 2.7-11 -- New York, March 2, 1966:

And here Arjuna is suffering, and he wants to make a solution, and therefore he accepts a spiritual master. So when we are conscious of our sufferings, we are awakened to the suffering situation... Suffering is there. Forgetfulness or ignorance of suffering is no meaning. Suffering is there. But when one is very serious to make a solution of his suffering, then a spiritual master required. Just like Arjuna requires now a spiritual master. Is it clear? Yes. So that suffering is there. It does not require any education, simply thinking that, a slight thinking, that "I do not want all these sufferings, but I am suffering. Why? Is there any solution? Is there...?" But there is solution.

Lecture on BG 2.12 -- Hyderabad, November 17, 1972:

Indian: Dvaita-advaita, yes?

Prabhupāda: Yes. Dvaita and advaita. Just like this finger is, is my finger. So it is part of this body. So you can, you can say, "This finger is also body." But, at the same time, the finger is not the body. Is it clear? You cannot say "This finger the whole body." But at the same time, you can say, "Yes, finger is body." If you say, "This is my body," there is no wrong because finger is also part of the body. But if you say that "The finger is body," that is also wrong. This is dvaita-advaita.

Lecture on BG 2.13 -- Germany, June 18, 1974:

So according to the circumstances, the mental changes are there. But the poor man is also a human being, and the rich man is also human being. Similarly, these so many apartments, or different types of body, different 8,400,000 types of body, the occupier, the living being, or the soul, is the same quality, but according to the apartment, or body, he has occupied, he has developed different consciousness and mentality. Is it clear or not? Where is the difficulty? They, these rascals, they do not believe in the transmigration of the soul, but where is the difficulty to understand transmigration of the soul? That is very clearly stated. And who is stating? Kṛṣṇa, the supreme authority.

Page Title:Is it clear?
Compiler:Visnu Murti, Sureshwardas
Created:17 of May, 2010
Totals by Section:BG=0, SB=0, CC=0, OB=0, Lec=31, Con=39, Let=1
No. of Quotes:71