Just like Rāma, Lord Rāmacandra. He married only one wife, Sītā. But Kṛṣṇa married 16,108. Now, if you question why Rāma is so moralist or whatever you like—He is sticking to one wife—and Kṛṣṇa is marrying sixteen thousand, that means you will... We say that God is omnipotent. That is a, I mean to say, qualification of God. So He is showing His omnipotency. That means why sixteen thousand? If He marries sixteen millions, sixteen billions, still, He is potent, full-fledged potency. So we cannot imagine even that how a person can marry sixteen thousand wives. This is inconceivable potency, to give an example of His inconceivable potency. And Rāma presented Himself as an ideal king. He did not manifest Himself as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but from symptoms of authentic literature we understand that He is God. But Kṛṣṇa personally said that "I am the Supreme Personality of God." Mattaḥ parataraṁ nānyat kiñcid asti dhanañjaya: (BG 7.7) "There is no superior truth beyond Me." The Rāmacandra never said that, that... He never said that "I am God." But those who are intelligent, they understood that He is God.
An example of... (Lectures): Difference between revisions
(Created page with '<div id="compilation"><div id="facts"> {{terms|"an example of"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Labangalatika}} {{complete|}} {{goal|9916}} {{first|13Aug09}} {{last|13Aug09}} {{totals_by_...') |
(Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div id="compilation"><div id="facts"> | <div id="compilation"> | ||
<div id="facts"> | |||
{{terms|"an example of"}} | {{terms|"an example of"}} | ||
{{notes|}} | {{notes|}} | ||
{{compiler|Labangalatika}} | {{compiler|Labangalatika|Tugomera}} | ||
{{complete| | {{complete|ALL}} | ||
{{first|13Aug09}} | {{first|13Aug09}} | ||
{{last| | {{last|29Nov09}} | ||
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec= | {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=3|Con=0|Let=0}} | ||
{{total| | {{total|3}} | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:An Example|1]] | [[Category:An Example|1]] | ||
[[Category:Lectures]]</div> | [[Category:Compilations from Lectures]] | ||
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2></div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Lectures" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures"><h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3></div> | <div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2> | ||
</div> | |||
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Lectures" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures"><h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3> | |||
</div> | |||
<div id="LectureonSB126MontrealAugust31968_0" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="32" link="Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968" link_text="Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968"> | <div id="LectureonSB126MontrealAugust31968_0" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="32" link="Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968" link_text="Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968"> | ||
<div class="heading">We cannot imagine even that how a person can marry sixteen thousand wives. This is inconceivable potency, to give an example of God's inconceivable potency.</div> | <div class="heading">We cannot imagine even that how a person can marry sixteen thousand wives. This is inconceivable potency, to give an example of God's inconceivable potency. | ||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968|Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text">Just like Rāma, Lord Rāmacandra. He married only one wife, Sītā. But Kṛṣṇa married 16,108. Now, if you question why Rāma is so moralist or whatever you like—He is sticking to one wife—and Kṛṣṇa is marrying sixteen thousand, that means you will... We say that God is omnipotent. That is a, I mean to say, qualification of God. So He is showing His omnipotency. That means why sixteen thousand? If He marries sixteen millions, sixteen billions, still, He is potent, full-fledged potency. So we cannot imagine even that how a person can marry sixteen thousand wives. This is inconceivable potency, to give an example of His inconceivable potency. And Rāma presented Himself as an ideal king. He did not manifest Himself as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but from symptoms of authentic literature we understand that He is God. But Kṛṣṇa personally said that "I am the Supreme Personality of God." Mattaḥ parataraṁ nānyat kiñcid asti dhanañjaya: ([[Vanisource:BG 7.7|BG 7.7]]) "There is no superior truth beyond Me." The Rāmacandra never said that, that... He never said that "I am God." But those who are intelligent, they understood that He is God.</div> | </div> | ||
</div></div> | <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968|Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Just like Rāma, Lord Rāmacandra. He married only one wife, Sītā. But Kṛṣṇa married 16,108. Now, if you question why Rāma is so moralist or whatever you like—He is sticking to one wife—and Kṛṣṇa is marrying sixteen thousand, that means you will... We say that God is omnipotent. That is a, I mean to say, qualification of God. So He is showing His omnipotency. That means why sixteen thousand? If He marries sixteen millions, sixteen billions, still, He is potent, full-fledged potency. So we cannot imagine even that how a person can marry sixteen thousand wives. This is inconceivable potency, to give an example of His inconceivable potency. And Rāma presented Himself as an ideal king. He did not manifest Himself as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but from symptoms of authentic literature we understand that He is God. But Kṛṣṇa personally said that "I am the Supreme Personality of God." Mattaḥ parataraṁ nānyat kiñcid asti dhanañjaya: ([[Vanisource:BG 7.7 (1972)|BG 7.7]]) "There is no superior truth beyond Me." The Rāmacandra never said that, that... He never said that "I am God." But those who are intelligent, they understood that He is God.</p> | ||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div id="LectureonSB11034TehranMarch131975_1" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="271" link="Lecture on SB 1.10.3-4 -- Tehran, March 13, 1975" link_text="Lecture on SB 1.10.3-4 -- Tehran, March 13, 1975"> | |||
<div class="heading">The world was happy in those days because there were kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to rule over the world. Let this king follow Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and show an example of how monarchy can make a perfect state. | |||
</div> | |||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 1.10.3-4 -- Tehran, March 13, 1975|Lecture on SB 1.10.3-4 -- Tehran, March 13, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">It is the person who rules, and not the impersonal government. If the person is perfect, the government is perfect. If the person is a fool, the government is a fool's paradise. That is the law of nature. There are so many stories of imperfect kings or executive heads. Therefore, the executive head must be a trained person like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, and he must have the full autocratic power to rule over the world. The conception of a world state can take shape only under the regime of a perfect king like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. The world was happy in those days because there were kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to rule over the world." Let this king follow Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and show an example of how monarchy can make a perfect state.</p> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<div id="Philosophy_Discussions" class="sub_section" sec_index="13" parent="Lectures" text="Philosophy Discussions"><h3>Philosophy Discussions</h3> | |||
</div> | |||
<div id="PhilosophyDiscussiononCharlesDarwin_0" class="quote" parent="Philosophy_Discussions" book="Lec" index="5" link="Philosophy Discussion on Charles Darwin" link_text="Philosophy Discussion on Charles Darwin"> | |||
<div class="heading">Why example? Why you give a fictitious example which you have no experience? | |||
</div> | |||
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on Charles Darwin|Philosophy Discussion on Charles Darwin]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: What is that purple men? But you have not also seen, why you are speaking like that?</p> | |||
<p>Śyāmasundara: I'm using it as an example of an exception.</p> | |||
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no. What, you are scientist, what you have never seen, why you are thinking of like that? That is my point.</p> | |||
<p>Śyāmasundara: I'm using it as an example of an exception...</p> | |||
<p>Prabhupāda: Why example? Why you give a fictitious example which you have no experience?</p> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 09:49, 15 May 2018
Lectures
Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures
We cannot imagine even that how a person can marry sixteen thousand wives. This is inconceivable potency, to give an example of God's inconceivable potency.
Lecture on SB 1.2.6 -- Montreal, August 3, 1968: The world was happy in those days because there were kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to rule over the world. Let this king follow Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and show an example of how monarchy can make a perfect state.
Lecture on SB 1.10.3-4 -- Tehran, March 13, 1975: It is the person who rules, and not the impersonal government. If the person is perfect, the government is perfect. If the person is a fool, the government is a fool's paradise. That is the law of nature. There are so many stories of imperfect kings or executive heads. Therefore, the executive head must be a trained person like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira, and he must have the full autocratic power to rule over the world. The conception of a world state can take shape only under the regime of a perfect king like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira. The world was happy in those days because there were kings like Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira to rule over the world." Let this king follow Mahārāja Yudhiṣṭhira and show an example of how monarchy can make a perfect state.
Philosophy Discussions
Why example? Why you give a fictitious example which you have no experience?
Philosophy Discussion on Charles Darwin: Prabhupāda: What is that purple men? But you have not also seen, why you are speaking like that?
Śyāmasundara: I'm using it as an example of an exception.
Prabhupāda: No, no. What, you are scientist, what you have never seen, why you are thinking of like that? That is my point.
Śyāmasundara: I'm using it as an example of an exception...
Prabhupāda: Why example? Why you give a fictitious example which you have no experience?