Principles of the renounced order: Difference between revisions
Laksmipriya (talk | contribs) |
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div id="compilation"> | |||
<div id="facts"> | |||
{{terms|"principles of the renounced order"|"principle of the renounced order" }} | {{terms|"principles of the renounced order"|"principle of the renounced order" }} | ||
| Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category:Principles Of...|2]] | |||
[[Category:Renounced Order of Life|2]] | |||
</div> | |||
<div class="section" id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2></div> | |||
<div class="sub_section" id="SB_Preface_and_Introduction" text="SB Preface and Introduction"><h3>SB Preface and Introduction</h3></div> | |||
== | <div class="quote" book="SB" link="SB Introduction" link_text="SB Introduction"> | ||
<div class="heading">On the principles of the renounced order of life and discipline, the Lord knew no compromise.</div> | |||
= | <div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:SB Introduction|SB Introduction]]:''' On the principles of the renounced order of life and discipline, the Lord knew no compromise, and therefore even though He knew that the King was a great devotee, He refused to see the King, only because the King was a dollar-and-cent man. By this example the Lord wanted to emphasize the proper behavior for a transcendentalist. A transcendentalist has nothing to do with women and money. He must always refrain from such intimate relations. The King was, however, favored by the Lord by the expert arrangement of the devotees. This means that the beloved devotee of the Lord can favor a neophyte more liberally than the Lord. Pure devotees, therefore, never commit an offense at the feet of another pure devotee. An offense at the lotus feet of the Lord is sometimes excused by the merciful Lord, but an offense at the feet of a devotee is very dangerous for one who actually wants to make progress in devotional service.</div> | ||
</div> | |||
< | <div class="section" id="Sri_Caitanya-caritamrta" text="Sri Caitanya-caritamrta"><h2>Sri Caitanya-caritamrta</h2></div> | ||
< | <div class="sub_section" id="CC_Madhya-lila" text="CC Madhya-lila"><h3>CC Madhya-lila</h3></div> | ||
== | <div class="quote" book="CC" link="CC Madhya 5.158" link_text="CC Madhya 5.158, Purport"> | ||
<div class="heading">Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu accepted the regulative principles of the renounced order of life. That is completely clear.</div> | |||
= | <div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:CC Madhya 5.158|CC Madhya 5.158, Purport]]:''' All the previous ācāryas, being induced to engage themselves fully in the service of the Lord, gave up attachment for material life and thus accepted the staff, which signifies full engagement of the mind, speech and body in the service of the Lord. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu accepted the regulative principles of the renounced order of life. That is completely clear. However, in the paramahaṁsa stage there is no need to accept a daṇḍa (staff), and Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was certainly in the paramahaṁsa stage. Nonetheless, to indicate that everyone should take sannyāsa at the end of life in order to engage fully in the service of the Lord, even paramahaṁsas like Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu and His confidential devotees follow the regulative principles unfailingly.</div> | ||
</div> | |||
< | <div class="quote" book="CC" link="CC Madhya 15.189" link_text="CC Madhya 15.189, Translation"> | ||
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:CC Madhya 15.189|CC Madhya 15.189, Translation]]: Sārvabhauma then said, “Please accept the invitation for twenty days.” | |||
'''But Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied, “It is not a religious principle of the renounced order.”'''</div> | |||
</div> | |||
< | </div> | ||
'''But Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied, “It is not a religious principle of the renounced order.”''' | |||
Latest revision as of 14:01, 19 February 2018
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Preface and Introduction
On the principles of the renounced order of life and discipline, the Lord knew no compromise.
SB Introduction: On the principles of the renounced order of life and discipline, the Lord knew no compromise, and therefore even though He knew that the King was a great devotee, He refused to see the King, only because the King was a dollar-and-cent man. By this example the Lord wanted to emphasize the proper behavior for a transcendentalist. A transcendentalist has nothing to do with women and money. He must always refrain from such intimate relations. The King was, however, favored by the Lord by the expert arrangement of the devotees. This means that the beloved devotee of the Lord can favor a neophyte more liberally than the Lord. Pure devotees, therefore, never commit an offense at the feet of another pure devotee. An offense at the lotus feet of the Lord is sometimes excused by the merciful Lord, but an offense at the feet of a devotee is very dangerous for one who actually wants to make progress in devotional service.
Sri Caitanya-caritamrta
CC Madhya-lila
Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu accepted the regulative principles of the renounced order of life. That is completely clear.
CC Madhya 5.158, Purport: All the previous ācāryas, being induced to engage themselves fully in the service of the Lord, gave up attachment for material life and thus accepted the staff, which signifies full engagement of the mind, speech and body in the service of the Lord. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu accepted the regulative principles of the renounced order of life. That is completely clear. However, in the paramahaṁsa stage there is no need to accept a daṇḍa (staff), and Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was certainly in the paramahaṁsa stage. Nonetheless, to indicate that everyone should take sannyāsa at the end of life in order to engage fully in the service of the Lord, even paramahaṁsas like Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu and His confidential devotees follow the regulative principles unfailingly.
CC Madhya 15.189, Translation: Sārvabhauma then said, “Please accept the invitation for twenty days.”
But Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu replied, “It is not a religious principle of the renounced order.”