Visva-rupa: Difference between revisions
(Created page with 'viśva-rūpa Category:Universal Form Category:Virat-rupa Category:Sanskrit Terms') |
(Pywikibot v.2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
viśva-rūpa | "Visva-rupa" | ||
:viśva-rūpa | |||
[[Category:Universal Form]] | [[Category:Universal Form]] | ||
[[Category:Virat-rupa]] | [[Category:Virat-rupa]] | ||
[[Category:Sanskrit Terms]] | [[Category:Sanskrit Terms]] | ||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:14, 7 July 2017
"Visva-rupa"
- viśva-rūpa
Subcategories Pages in category
This category has the following 6 subcategories, out of 6 total.
G
K
V
Pages in category "Visva-rupa"
The following 15 pages are in this category, out of 15 total.
A
- After seeing the visvarupa Arjuna was afraid. He was in friendly relationship with Krsna, and when he saw His visvarupa, he became too much perturbed in his mind
- After this, Jagannatha Misra got a son of the name Visvarupa, who was most powerful and highly qualified because He was an incarnation of Baladeva
- Arjuna, as a pure devotee of the Lord, never previously saw the contemplated universal form of the Lord (visva-rupa), but when he did see it, his curiosities were satisfied
T
- The conception of the virat-rupa or visva-rupa of the Supreme Absolute Truth is especially meant for the neophyte who can hardly think of the transcendental form of the Personality of Godhead
- The fact is that the devotee is not concerned to see the visva-rupa, the universal form, but Arjuna wanted to see it to substantiate Krsna's statement so that in the future people could understand. BG 1972 purports
- The husband and wife (Jagannatha Misra and Sacimata), having gotten Visvarupa as their son, were very pleased within their minds. Because of their pleasure, they specifically began to serve the lotus feet of Govinda
- The virat-rupa or visva-rupa, the gigantic universal form of the Lord, is not an eternal form of the Lord
- The virat-rupa or visva-rupa, the gigantic universal form of the Lord, which is very much appreciated by the impersonalist, is not an eternal form of the Lord. It is manifested by the supreme will of the Lord after the ingredients of material creation