Simpleton: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div id="compilation"> | |||
<div id="facts"> | |||
{{terms|"simpleton"|" simpletons"}} | {{terms|"simpleton"|" simpletons"}} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
{{toc right}} | {{toc right}} | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Simpleton|1]] | ||
</div> | |||
== Srimad-Bhagavatam = | <div class="section" id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2></div> | ||
=== SB Canto 2 | <div class="sub_section" id="SB_Canto_2" text="SB Canto 2"><h3>SB Canto 2</h3></div> | ||
< | <div class="quote" book="SB" link="SB 2.2.18" link_text="SB 2.2.18, Purport"> | ||
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:SB 2.2.18|SB 2.2.18, Purport]]:''' Apart from the class of impersonalists or nondevotees, there are also classes who pose themselves as devotees of the Lord but at heart maintain the idea of salvation by becoming one with the impersonal Brahman. They wrongly manufacture their own way of devotional service by open debauchery and mislead others who are simpletons or debauchees like themselves.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
== Conversations and Morning Walks | <div class="section" id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2></div> | ||
=== 1972 Conversations and Morning Walks | <div class="sub_section" id="1972_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1972 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1972 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3></div> | ||
< | <div class="quote" book="Con" link="Talk with Bob Cohen -- February 27-29, 1972, Mayapura" link_text="Talk with Bob Cohen -- February 27-29, 1972, Mayapura"> | ||
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Talk with Bob Cohen -- February 27-29, 1972, Mayapura|Talk with Bob Cohen -- February 27-29, 1972, Mayapura]]:''' Prabhupāda: The animal is very innocent. You cut its throat, it won't protest. So innocent is not very good qualification. The animals are all innocent. Therefore you get the chance of cutting their throat. So just... To become innocent is not a very good qualification. Our proposition is one must be very, very intelligent, and then he can understand Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa yei bhaje se baḍa catura. So to become innocent, ignorant, simpleton is not very good qualification. Simplicity is all right, but one should not be unintelligent.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
== Correspondence = | <div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div> | ||
=== 1969 Correspondence | <div class="sub_section" id="1969_Correspondence" text="1969 Correspondence"><h3>1969 Correspondence</h3></div> | ||
< | <div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Hamsaduta -- New Vrindaban 8 June, 1969" link_text="Letter to Hamsaduta -- New Vrindaban 8 June, 1969"> | ||
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Hamsaduta -- New Vrindaban 8 June, 1969|Letter to Hamsaduta -- New Vrindaban 8 June, 1969]]:''' There is a Sanskrit proverb, sati shatyam samacharit, and this means if somebody is cunning, we must also become cunning. To a cunning person we must not be a simpleton. Krishna Conscious devotees are expected to be very intelligent, so we have to work very intelligently to prove our advancement in Krishna Consciousness.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
< | <div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Gargamuni -- Tittenhurst 8 October, 1969" link_text="Letter to Gargamuni -- Tittenhurst 8 October, 1969"> | ||
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Gargamuni -- Tittenhurst 8 October, 1969|Letter to Gargamuni -- Tittenhurst 8 October, 1969]]:''' So you can ask him for the purchase invoice, and that will be nice. First of all ask him to send samples. Then begin business. Unless you are satisfied with the price and sample, don't put any order. Acyutananda is very simpleton, and it is very easy to cheat him. That is the past experience.</div> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
Latest revision as of 15:22, 1 December 2015
Srimad-Bhagavatam
SB Canto 2
SB 2.2.18, Purport: Apart from the class of impersonalists or nondevotees, there are also classes who pose themselves as devotees of the Lord but at heart maintain the idea of salvation by becoming one with the impersonal Brahman. They wrongly manufacture their own way of devotional service by open debauchery and mislead others who are simpletons or debauchees like themselves.
Conversations and Morning Walks
1972 Conversations and Morning Walks
Talk with Bob Cohen -- February 27-29, 1972, Mayapura: Prabhupāda: The animal is very innocent. You cut its throat, it won't protest. So innocent is not very good qualification. The animals are all innocent. Therefore you get the chance of cutting their throat. So just... To become innocent is not a very good qualification. Our proposition is one must be very, very intelligent, and then he can understand Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa yei bhaje se baḍa catura. So to become innocent, ignorant, simpleton is not very good qualification. Simplicity is all right, but one should not be unintelligent.
Correspondence
1969 Correspondence
Letter to Hamsaduta -- New Vrindaban 8 June, 1969: There is a Sanskrit proverb, sati shatyam samacharit, and this means if somebody is cunning, we must also become cunning. To a cunning person we must not be a simpleton. Krishna Conscious devotees are expected to be very intelligent, so we have to work very intelligently to prove our advancement in Krishna Consciousness.
Letter to Gargamuni -- Tittenhurst 8 October, 1969: So you can ask him for the purchase invoice, and that will be nice. First of all ask him to send samples. Then begin business. Unless you are satisfied with the price and sample, don't put any order. Acyutananda is very simpleton, and it is very easy to cheat him. That is the past experience.