No Knowledge of God: Difference between revisions
Visnu Murti (talk | contribs) (Created page with "# Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes Category:Wanted Categories - Vaniquotes") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:God - Umbrella Category | [[Category:No Knowledge]] | ||
[[Category:Knowledge of God]] | |||
[[Category:Of God]] | |||
[[Category:God - Umbrella Category]] | |||
[[Category:Of God - Umbrella Category]] | |||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | [[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 17:14, 12 June 2020
Pages in category "No Knowledge of God"
The following 23 pages are in this category, out of 23 total.
G
- God is great, but we have no knowledge how He is great. We can simply think of gagana, the sky. That is the greatest. But we do not know that millions of skies are within the belly of the Supreme Personality of Godhead
- Gross materialists without any knowledge of Brahman, Paramatma or Bhagavan conclude material nature to be the ultimate cause of the material manifestation
H
- He (a demoniac person) does not care for the supreme control of the Personality of Godhead because he has no knowledge. BG 1972 purports
- He (God) incarnates Himself even as a fish, hog, tree and many other forms, but less intelligent persons who have no knowledge of Him deride Him even if He is in human society as a human being
S
- So-called modern civilization, they have no knowledge of God, although they are trying to study the laws of God. But they should accept at least theoretically there must be God
- Srimad-Bhagavatam is full of such activities of the Lord in relationship with His devotees, and the nondevotees have no knowledge of such pastimes
T
- The Bhagavata says: "Whether he has given any aural reception about Krsna, that is the test." No. He has no knowledge about Krsna. Then he must be praised by persons who are like camel, asses, dogs, hogs
- The brahmana poet from Bengal was an offender in the estimation of Svarupa Damodara Gosvami, for although the poet had no knowledge of the Absolute Truth, he had nevertheless tried to describe it
- The conclusion is that one who has no knowledge of the potencies of the Supreme Truth will realize the impersonal Brahman
- The Lord says that one should approach Him and go back to Him, back home, back to Godhead. But unfortunately people have no knowledge of what God is, whether one can go back home to Him or not, and whether or not it is practical
- The present situation is the so-called modern civilization, they have no knowledge of God, although they are trying to study the laws of God