Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


So-called scientific explanation: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"so-called scientific explanation"}}
{{terms|"so-called scientific explanation"}}


Line 17: Line 19:
{{toc right}}
{{toc right}}


[[Category:So called]]
[[Category:So-called Scientific]]
 
[[Category:Scientific]]


[[Category:Explanation]]
[[Category:Explanation]]
</div>


== Correspondence ==
<div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div>


=== 1975 Correspondence ===
<div class="sub_section" id="1975_Correspondence" text="1975 Correspondence"><h3>1975 Correspondence</h3></div>


<span class="q_heading">'''Any sane man can understand the principle of re-incarnation. There is no need of giving some long so-called scientific explanation.'''</span>
<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975" link_text="Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975">
<div class="heading">Any sane man can understand the principle of re-incarnation. There is no need of giving some long so-called scientific explanation.</div>


<span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975|Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975]]:''' Your endeavor to prove scientifically the existence of re-incarnation is not very practical. It is like bringing a cannon to kill a mosquito. It is not required to bring a cannon to kill a mosquito, similarly any sane man can understand the principle of re-incarnation. There is no need of giving some long so-called scientific explanation. Explanation is already given in the Bhagavad-gita, as it is. Krishna, the Supreme Authority has already explained, and you should accept and understand His explanation and then try to make others understand.</span>
<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975|Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975]]:''' Your endeavor to prove scientifically the existence of re-incarnation is not very practical. It is like bringing a cannon to kill a mosquito. It is not required to bring a cannon to kill a mosquito, similarly any sane man can understand the principle of re-incarnation. There is no need of giving some long so-called scientific explanation. Explanation is already given in the Bhagavad-gita, as it is. Krishna, the Supreme Authority has already explained, and you should accept and understand His explanation and then try to make others understand.</div>
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 09:05, 6 March 2022

Expressions researched:
"so-called scientific explanation"

Correspondence

1975 Correspondence

Any sane man can understand the principle of re-incarnation. There is no need of giving some long so-called scientific explanation.
Letter to Mr. R. Van den Tak -- Honolulu 10 June, 1975: Your endeavor to prove scientifically the existence of re-incarnation is not very practical. It is like bringing a cannon to kill a mosquito. It is not required to bring a cannon to kill a mosquito, similarly any sane man can understand the principle of re-incarnation. There is no need of giving some long so-called scientific explanation. Explanation is already given in the Bhagavad-gita, as it is. Krishna, the Supreme Authority has already explained, and you should accept and understand His explanation and then try to make others understand.