Collaborate with us to invoke and fully manifest Srila Prabhupada's Vani-presence

Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia

Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge

Special

Related changes

← Category:Was Not

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide anonymous users | Hide my edits | Hide bots | Hide minor edits
Show new changes starting from 03:05, 28 June 2024

List of abbreviations:

N: This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m: This is a minor edit
b: This edit was performed by a bot
(±123): The page size changed by this number of bytes

27 June 2024

18:23

In replying to Hiranyakasipu's question about why Prahlada Maharaja had a deviant view, Prahlada said that his view was not deviant, for the natural position of everyone is to be attracted by Krsna‎ diffhist +36‎ Rahul talk contribs

26 June 2024

12:24

The great sages and saintly persons could beget another person from the body of the dead King Vena, but it was not possible for them to bring King Vena back to life. King Vena was gone, and certainly he had taken another body‎ diffhist +10‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

24 June 2024

17:18

In his prayer to the Lord, Prahlada Maharaja said that he was not personally interested in liberation from this material world; rather, he did not wish to be liberated from this material condition until all fallen souls were delivered‎ diffhist +10‎ Rahul talk contribs

12:34

How the demigod had been obliged to accept the body of a lizard was not a secret to Lord Krsna, but still, for others' information, the Lord inquired‎ diffhist −1‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

23 June 2024

02:47

Vrtrasura was not at all interested in victory; he was interested in being killed so that he could immediately return home, back to Godhead‎ diffhist −10‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

21 June 2024

11:03

O Vidura, we (Maitreya) have heard that Brahma had a daughter named Vak who was born from his body and who attracted his mind toward sex, although she was not sexually inclined towards him‎ diffhist +10‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

02:24

Because there were insufficient topics directly concerning Krsna in the Puranas, Mahabharata, etc., he (Vidura) was not satisfied and wanted to know more about Krsna‎ diffhist +6‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

19 June 2024

			06:54		Vidura asked Maitreya some common questions, which was not originally his intention. Uddhava asked Vidura to approach Maitreya Muni and inquire into all the truths concerning the Lord, His name, fame, quality, form, pastimes, entourage, etc‎‎ 2 changes history −43‎ [Nabakumar‎ (2×)]
					06:54 (cur \| prev) +6‎ Nabakumar talk contribs
					03:54 (cur \| prev) −49‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

18 June 2024

14:54

When the First and Second World Wars began, it was not for pleasing Krsna. The Germans wanted that their sense gratification not be hampered by the Britishers. That means it was a war of sense gratification‎ diffhist +1‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

13:56

In spite of any suffering, you can make progress in spiritual life. Just like Prahlada Maharaja himself. His father put him into so many suffering conditions, but he was not impeded - he made spiritual progress‎ diffhist +1‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

03:01

Vidura did not ask about the welfare of his elder brother because there was no chance of his well-being, only news of his gliding down to hell. Vidura was a sincere well-wisher for Dhrtarastra, and he had a thought about him in the corner of his heart‎ diffhist −8‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

17 June 2024

02:36

Vidura asked Maitreya some common questions, which was not originally his intention. Uddhava asked Vidura to approach Maitreya Muni and inquire into all the truths concerning the Lord, His name, fame, quality, form, pastimes, entourage, etc‎ diffhist +87‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

16 June 2024

11:17

By manifesting His form as Nrsimhadeva, the Lord also preserved the truth of Lord Brahma's promise that Hiranyakasipu was not to be killed by any animal or any man. The Lord appeared in a form that could not be said to be fully a man or a lion‎ diffhist −20‎ Deepali talk contribs

15 June 2024

			12:58		The son of Sukracarya, Hiranyakasipu's spiritual master, said: O enemy of King Indra, O King! Whatever your son Prahlada has said was not taught to him by me or anyone else‎‎ 2 changes history −14‎ [Nabakumar‎ (2×)]
					12:58 (cur \| prev) −5‎ Nabakumar talk contribs
					12:46 (cur \| prev) −9‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

			10:51		Actually it was the body left by Vrtrasura that was cut to pieces by Indra; Vrtrasura himself was not killed. In his original consciousness, Vrtrasura returned home, back to Godhead, to become an associate of Lord Sankarsana‎‎ 2 changes history 0‎ [Nabakumar‎ (2×)]
					10:51 (cur \| prev) −19‎ Nabakumar talk contribs
					04:18 (cur \| prev) +19‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

14 June 2024

06:15

That incident was not forgotten by Brahma (that Brahma's previous sons the four kumaras, refused to obey their father), and therefore the obedience of Manu Svayambhuva was very encouraging‎ diffhist −20‎ Deepali talk contribs

13 June 2024

			12:02		(Move log)‎ [Nabakumar‎ (3×)]
					12:02 Nabakumar talk contribs moved page Saints (like the Kumaras) were not to be forbidden to enter the kingdom of Vaikuntha, but by chance the doormen objected to their entrance. This was not fitting to Saints (like the Kumaras) were not to be forbidden to enter the kingdom of Vaikuntha, but by chance the doormen (Jaya and Vijaya) objected to their entrance. This was not fitting ‎
					11:26 Nabakumar talk contribs moved page He (Krsna) is the greatest well-wishing friend of everyone, and the Kumaras wanted to see Him. The doorkeepers should have known that the four sages (four Kumaras) had no other business, and therefore to restrict them from entering the palace was not apt to He (Krsna) is the greatest well-wishing friend of everyone, and the Kumaras wanted to see Him. The doorkeepers (Jaya & Vijaya) should have known that the four sages had no other business, and therefore to restrict them from entering the palace was not apt ‎
					10:36 Nabakumar talk contribs moved page By mistake the doormen held the sages from entering Vaikunthaloka, but because they were engaged in the transcendental service of the Lord, their annihilation was not expected by advanced devotees to By mistake the doormen (Jaya and Vijaya) held the sages (four Kumaras) from entering Vaikunthaloka, but because they were engaged in the transcendental service of the Lord, their annihilation was not expected by advanced devotees ‎

12:01

Saints (like the Kumaras) were not to be forbidden to enter the kingdom of Vaikuntha, but by chance the doormen objected to their entrance. This was not fitting‎ diffhist +67‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

11:24

He (Krsna) is the greatest well-wishing friend of everyone, and the Kumaras wanted to see Him. The doorkeepers should have known that the four sages (four Kumaras) had no other business, and therefore to restrict them from entering the palace was not apt‎ diffhist +41‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

10:37

By mistake the doormen (Jaya and Vijaya) held the sages (four Kumaras) from entering Vaikunthaloka, but because they were engaged in the transcendental service of the Lord, their annihilation was not expected by advanced devotees‎ diffhist +93‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

07:28

In replying to Hiranyakasipu's question about why Prahlada Maharaja had a deviant view, Prahlada said that his view was not deviant, for the natural position of everyone is to be attracted by Krsna‎ diffhist −23‎ Rahul talk contribs

04:34

Although Indra was stealing the horse from his father, Vijitasva knew perfectly well that Indra was not an ordinary thief‎ diffhist −8‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

02:52

He (Vijitasva) received this title from Indra, and it refers to the time when Indra stole Maharaja Prthu's horse from the sacrificial arena. Indra was not visible to others when he was stealing the horse, but Maharaja Prthu's son Vijitasva could see him‎ diffhist +1‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

12 June 2024

14:41

Brahma was the first created being. Who spoke to him? Since no one was there, who was the spiritual master to give knowledge‎ diffhist −18‎ Deepali talk contribs

09:44

Move log Rahul talk contribs moved page Although Bali Maharaja was actually following the path of his grandfather (Prahlad Maharaja), because of his great humility he thought that he was not to Although Bali Maharaja was actually following the path of his grandfather (Prahlada Maharaja), because of his great humility he thought that he was not ‎

10 June 2024

14:58

Brahma, who was not born of a material source but of the lotus flower coming out of the navel abdomen of the Lord, is the creator of all those who are materially born. Of course, by the grace of the Lord, Brahma was able to see the form of the Lord‎ diffhist −15‎ Deepali talk contribs

14:34

Brahma was completely mystified. He could not understand what he was seeing, and then he was not even able to see. Lord Krsna, understanding Brahma's position, then removed that yogamaya covering‎ diffhist −8‎ Deepali talk contribs

8 June 2024

			12:32		Maharaja Yudhisthira was not a typically unenlightened political leader of modern democracy. Maharaja Yudhisthira was instructed by Bhismadeva and the infallible Lord also, and therefore he had full knowledge of everything in perfection‎‎ 2 changes history +22‎ [Nabakumar‎ (2×)]
					12:32 (cur \| prev) +32‎ Nabakumar talk contribs
					12:31 (cur \| prev) −10‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

7 June 2024

11:22

Because he (Prthu Maharaja) had just been coronated he could not manifest his godly qualities in action. Therefore he was not willing to accept the praise of the devotees‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

6 June 2024

09:05

When Pariksit was cursed by a brahmin to die within seven days, why Krsna did not save him, or why he did not seek Krsna's protection? This question may be raised. He was young man. He was not old man. He could live. That question was made‎ diffhist +40‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

08:31

We get this historical event from the Srimad-Bhagavatam, that during the time of Maharaja Prthu there was scarcity of food, so the King wanted to punish the earthly deity, because she was not supplying food‎ diffhist −4‎ Deepali talk contribs

08:10

As one of the demigods, the earthly planet was taking her share in the yajnas but in return she was not producing sufficient food grains. Prthu Maharaja was therefore justified in threatening to punish her for her offense‎ diffhist −12‎ Deepali talk contribs

06:15

The word nirvisangah ("uncontaminated") is very significant because Maharaja Prthu was not attached to the results of his activities. In this material world a person is always thinking of the proprietorship of everything he accumulates or works for‎ diffhist +13‎ Deepali talk contribs

04:57

If Pariksit Maharaja was not in this position, that he was to die within seven days, this Bhagavata would not have come. This is the purport. That was the purpose. Otherwise, he could counteract‎ diffhist +18‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

5 June 2024

06:17

Reciters like the suta & the magadha were confidentially aware that Prthu was an incarnation of the Personality of God. Although He denied such praise because he was not at that time exhibiting his godly qualities, the reciters did not stop praising him‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

06:13

Maharaja Prthu was a directly empowered incarnation of Lord Visnu; therefore he was not subject to the reactions of pious or impious activities‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

05:35

Whether he could soon be relieved from the dangerous position of materialistic existence. This was not a question personally for Prthu Maharaja‎ diffhist +2‎ Deepali talk contribs

4 June 2024

06:56

He (Vijitasva) received this title from Indra, and it refers to the time when Indra stole Maharaja Prthu's horse from the sacrificial arena. Indra was not visible to others when he was stealing the horse, but Maharaja Prthu's son Vijitasva could see him‎ diffhist −10‎ Deepali talk contribs

06:36

Maharaja Prthu, wiping the tears from his eyes, tried to look upon the Lord, but it appeared that the King was not fully satisfied by looking at Him. Thus the King offered the following prayers‎ diffhist +13‎ Deepali talk contribs

05:35

The Queen (Arci) was completely aware that her husband (King Prthu) was not dead, although the symptoms of life - action, intelligence and sense perception - had ceased‎ diffhist −37‎ Deepali talk contribs

3 June 2024

07:03

Why should mother Laksmi, the mother of the universe, be angry with an insignificant devotee like Prthu Maharaja? All this was not very likely. Yet Prthu Maharaja, just for his personal protection, appealed to the Lord to take his part‎ diffhist +13‎ Deepali talk contribs

2 June 2024

13:45

As we have already explained previously, when a living being is specifically empowered by the Supreme Lord to act for a particular purpose, he is called a saktyavesa-avatara. Prthu Maharaja was not only a saktyavesa-avatara but also a great devotee‎ diffhist +44‎ Visnu Murti talk contribs

13:44

Although Maharaja Prthu was simply enthroned on the royal seat and was not at that time exhibiting his godly powers, the reciters like the suta, the magadha and the vandi understood that King Prthu was an incarnation of God‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

1 June 2024

07:40

For ten days I was staying in Risikesh in a very nice house on the side of the Ganges River. But my health was not good and so I have come to Vrndavana where I will stay indefinitely‎ diffhist +37‎ Elaine talk contribs

Retrieved from "https://vaniquotes.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked"