In this verse (SB 5.1.29) iva has twice been used to indicate that Maharaja Priyavrata acted exactly like a henpecked husband and thereby seemed to have lost his sense of human responsibility: Revision history

31 May 2024

• curprev 13:3313:33, 31 May 2024‎ Nabakumar talk contribs‎ 5,577 bytes −13‎ No edit summary

19 October 2023

• curprev 05:4605:46, 19 October 2023‎ Nabakumar talk contribs‎ m 5,590 bytes 0‎ Nabakumar moved page Iva has twice been used to indicate that Maharaja Priyavrata acted exactly like a henpecked husband and thereby seemed to have lost his sense of human responsibility to In this verse (SB 5.1.29) iva has twice been used to indicate that Maharaja Priyavrata acted exactly like a henpecked husband and thereby seemed to have lost his sense of human responsibility
• curprev 05:4605:46, 19 October 2023‎ Nabakumar talk contribs‎ 5,590 bytes +99‎ No edit summary

1 February 2022

• curprev 15:5815:58, 1 February 2022‎ BhavesvariRadhika talk contribs‎ 5,491 bytes +5,491‎ No edit summary

2 November 2020

• curprev 16:5216:52, 2 November 2020‎ Angela talk contribs‎ 5,514 bytes +5,514‎ Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"iva has twice been used to indicate that Mahārāja Priyavrata acted exactly like a henpecked husband and thereby seemed to ha..."