View source for You haven't got to manufacture anything. What Krsna has already said, you repeat. Finish. Don't make addition, alteration. Then you become guru. Very simple thing

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"You haven't got to manufacture anything. What Kṛṣṇa has already said, you repeat. Finish. Don't make addition, alteration. Then you become ''guru''. Very simple thing"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2015-10-28T09:28:08Z}}
{{last|2015-10-28T09:28:08Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:We Have (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We Have Not (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Got To]]
[[Category:Our Manufacturing (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Anything]]
[[Category:What]]
[[Category:Krsna Says]]
[[Category:Already]]
[[Category:We (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Our Repeating (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Finish]]
[[Category:We Do Not (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Make]]
[[Category:Addition]]
[[Category:Alteration]]
[[Category:Becoming Guru (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Very Simple]]
[[Category:Thing]]
[[Category:Prabhupada and Training]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Room Conversations, 1966 - 1977]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Room Conversations, 1977]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in India, Hrishikesh]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>1977 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Caitanya Mahāprabhu says, yāre dekha tāre kaha kṛṣṇa-upadeśa (CC Madhya 7.128). You haven't got to manufacture anything. What Kṛṣṇa has already said, you repeat. Finish. Don't make addition, alteration. Then you become guru. Very simple thing. If I say that "My father said, 'This is a bell,' " I am correct because I have learned it from my father, authority. I may be fool, rascal; it doesn't matter. But because I have learned it from the authority and presenting it that "This is a bell," this is perfect.
</div>


<mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/770511ED-HRISHIKESH_clip00.mp3</mp3player>
<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:770511 - Conversation - Hrishikesh|770511 - Conversation - Hrishikesh]]:
</div>
<div class="text">
Prabhupāda: So we are preaching that "Here is God: Kṛṣṇa." Our preaching is simple. Kṛṣṇa says, "I am the Supreme." We say, "Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme." That's all. We repeat. We don't manufacture. What is the use of manufacturing? I am imperfect. Whatever I manufacture, that is imperfect. So better to repeat the words of the perfect. That is Caitanya Mahāprabhu's mission. He said, "Every one of you become ''guru'' and deliver your surrounding persons, either you are in family or in a neighborhood or in a society or in a nation—as much as you can." ''Āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa'' ([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 7.128|CC Madhya 7.128]]). So whatever limited circle, you just become ''guru'' and deliver them. Deliver means deliver from the ignorance. Everyone is in ignorance, ''dehātma-buddhiḥ''. ''Yasyātma-buddhiḥ kuṇape tri-dhātuke'', ''sa eva go-kharaḥ'' ([[Vanisource:SB 10.84.13|SB 10.84.13]]). So we have to teach them that "You are not this body. You are pure soul. Your business is different." And that is enlightenment. That is  business of guru. So we can do that business. And how to do it? That is . . . Caitanya Mahāprabhu says, ''yāre dekha tāre kaha kṛṣṇa-upadeśa'' ([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 7.128|CC Madhya 7.128]]). You haven't got to manufacture anything. What Kṛṣṇa has already said, you repeat. Finish. Don't make addition, alteration. Then you become ''guru''. Very simple thing. If I say that "My father said, 'This is a bell,' " I am correct because I have learned it from my father, authority. I may be fool, rascal; it doesn't matter. But because I have learned it from the authority and presenting it that "This is a bell," this is perfect. Similarly, I cannot become ''guru'' because I am imperfect. My senses are imperfect. I cannot see what is beyond this wall, although I am very much proud of my eyes. I want to see. What you can see? Imperfect, all senses. But if some authority says that "Beyond this wall this is the . . . like this," it is all right. So we have to follow this path, that you become ''guru'', deliver your neighborhood men, associates, but speak the authoritative words of Kṛṣṇa. Then it will act. 

So our this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is like that. We do not manufacture ideas. That has spoiled the whole world. Just like you said about Christ. That he never said "Supreme Lord." He said, "I am son of God. I have brought message from Him." Similarly, our position is that "We have got a message from Kṛṣṇa. Take it." So we have no difficulty. Anyone can say. If we study ''Bhagavad-gītā'' nicely, assimilate and repeat it, it will act. Kṛṣṇa says, ''man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru'' ([[Vanisource:BG 18.65 (1972)|BG 18.65]]). We are teaching that "You always think of Kṛṣṇa. You become a devotee. You worship Him and offer your obeisances." It doesn't require to become very learned scholar. Anyone can do it. A child can do it. We are teaching. Where is the difficulty? Hmm? Is there any difficulty? Why don't you do that? Why you are making so big, big program without any effect? Take the simple program, and preach everywhere. That is being done. We are preaching this philosophy all over the world, and they are accepting. You know that. In Europe, America, Australia, Canada—in all parts of the world they are appreciating. Even the Africans, they are chanting, dancing. So if I have manufactured some theory and with a limited circle I am satisfied, that is good? Or Kṛṣṇa's program, Caitanya Mahāprabhu's program, which is being accepted all over the world—that is good or this is good? Which one is good? So everyone is manufacturing some concoction, and he's satisfied with few followers. But we have got Kṛṣṇa's program, and it is being followed all over the world. So which one is good: with some limited circle or all over the world? There is a proof. We are not theoretical.