View source for Well, then they want to say that if nature can't be self-existing, how can God?

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Well, then they want to say that if nature can't be self-existing, how can God"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Marc|Rishab}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|21Jul11}}
{{last|15Aug12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1975]]
[[Category:Questions On... Material Creation, Universe]]
[[Category:Questions On... God]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkJuly171975SanFrancisco_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="147" link="Morning Walk -- July 17, 1975, San Francisco" link_text="Morning Walk -- July 17, 1975, San Francisco">
<div class="heading">All right, nature is existing, but our proposition is that without father, how nature can give birth? If the woman is existing, the man must be existing. Just like in your country it is experienced that a girl has given birth to a child. Nobody knows who is the father. But still, it is accepted that she was pregnanted by a man, that is... You cannot say. It may be missing, but you have to accept, not that this girl is giving birth child without any union with a man. You cannot say that.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- July 17, 1975, San Francisco|Morning Walk -- July 17, 1975, San Francisco]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Bahulāśva: ...nature has generated everything on its own. Just like we say that Kṛṣṇa...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Where is that nature, generating everything? Where is that nature? Show me.</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: They give the example of the corn. Corn doesn't have to have a... They say corn produces the seeds as well as the...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Then wherefrom the corn came?</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: From itself. You see, they theorize that naturally...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Theorize, theorize. But we say corn is produced... When the seeds are thrown on the ground, then corns are produced. Wherefrom... The corn is not dropping from the sky.</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: Originally, right.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: We have not seen the original.</p>
<p>Dharmādhyakṣa: Well, originally, they say, it was just some chance combination of atoms and molecules...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That is... A chance means you are a rascal. Nothing takes place with chance. That is his rascaldom. Nothing takes place. The answer is in the Bhagavad..., bījo 'haṁ sarva-bhūtānām: (Bg 7.10) "The original seed I am." The answer is there. Bījo 'haṁ sarva-bhūtānām. Challenge these rascals. They are cheating so many people.</p>
<p>Bahulāśva: Well, then they want to say that if nature can't be self-existing, how can God?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: All right, nature is existing, but our proposition is that without father, how nature can give birth? If the woman is existing, the man must be existing. Just like in your country it is experienced that a girl has given birth to a child. Nobody knows who is the father. But still, it is accepted that she was pregnanted by a man, that is... You cannot say. It may be missing, but you have to accept, not that this girl is giving birth child without any union with a man. You cannot say that.</p>
<p>Bahulāśva: Sometimes they say, Śrīla Prabhupāda, that these examples are only valid because we're people and therefore we're...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: So you are people because you are nonsense. Say that, "Because you are nonsense. Why do you say people? You do not have any common sense even, that a mother gives birth to a child without a father."</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>