View source for We do not interpret the words of the Bhagavad-gita according to our own desire. No. Actually, from literary point of view, interpretation is required when things are not understood very clearly. Then interpretation required

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"We do not interpret the words of the Bhagavad-gītā according to our own desire. No"|"Actually, from literary point of view, interpretation is required when things are not understood very clearly. Then interpretation required"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|PoojaA}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2022-08-30T06:19:09Z}}
{{last|2022-08-30T06:19:09Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:We Do Not (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Interpreting the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:According]]
[[Category:Our Desires (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Negation]]
[[Category:Actually]]
[[Category:Literal]]
[[Category:Point of View]]
[[Category:Interpretation Is Required When Things Are Not Clear]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - POOJA]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Sometimes Bhagavad-gītā is misinterpreted that this battle, I mean to say, dharma-kṣetra kuru-kṣetra means "This body." We do not misinterpret in that way. There is no question of misinterpretation. We are presenting Bhagavad-gītā as it is. We do not change by our whimsical imagination, concoction. We do not interpret the words of the Bhagavad-gītā according to our own desire. No.
Actually, from literary point of view, interpretation is required when things are not understood very clearly. Then interpretation required. In the law court, when the lawyers try to interpret before the judge, when the terms are not very clear . . . that is the same way, in, in . . . amongst the associates and society of learned scholars. Interpretation is not required when the things are very clear.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:721206 - Lecture BG 02.01 - Ahmedabad|721206 - Lecture BG 02.01 - Ahmedabad]]
</div>
<div class="text">
sañjaya uvāca. The Sañjaya is speaking to Dhṛtarāṣṭra. Sañjaya is seeing the battlefield within his heart. That is another television. And by the grace of Vyāsadeva, he learned the art, that he advanced . . . he was so much advanced that the . . . just like we see television, relay from the battlefield, and he, Duryodhana . . . Dhṛtarāṣṭra was blind, and his secretary, Sañjaya, he was speaking, he was seeing the activities in the battlefield. Dhṛtarāṣṭra inquired from him:

<div class="quote_verse">
:dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre
:samavetā yuyutsavaḥ
:māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva
:kim akurvata sañjaya 
:([[Vanisource:BG 1.1 (1972)|BG 1.1]])
</div>

He was asking Sañjaya, "What did they do?" Kim akurvata sañjaya. That was the question. And first of all, Sañjaya described the arrangement in the battlefield, and then he's speaking.

Now, sometimes Bhagavad-gītā is misinterpreted that this battle, I mean to say, dharma-kṣetra kuru-kṣetra means "This body." We do not misinterpret in that way. There is no question of misinterpretation. We are presenting Bhagavad-gītā as it is. We do not change by our whimsical imagination, concoction. We do not interpret the words of the Bhagavad-gītā according to our own desire. No.

Actually, from literary point of view, interpretation is required when things are not understood very clearly. Then interpretation required. In the law court, when the lawyers try to interpret before the judge, when the terms are not very clear . . . that is the same way, in, in . . . amongst the associates and society of learned scholars. Interpretation is not required when the things are very clear. Just like the sun, sunshine, sunlight.

There is no need of a lamp to show the sun. The sun is self-effulgent. It is already there. Light is there. Why one should take a lamp to show the sun? This misinterpretation has killed the spirit, the real essence, of Bhagavad-gītā. So there was so many editions and so many misinterpretation. Our this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, our proposition is that we are, I mean to say, presenting Bhagavad-gītā as it is. We do not misinterpret.

So dharma-kṣetra kuru-kṣetra. Kurukṣetra is dharma-kṣetra, the place where religious ritualistic performances are done. Kuru-kṣetre dharmam ācaret. That is the Vedic version. So Kurukṣetra is always . . . still people go for pilgrimage in Kurukṣetra, and the station is there, Kurukṣetra, and the place is there. People go there, Kurukṣetra. Why one should interpret that kuru-kṣetra means this body and Pāṇḍavas means these pañca-indriyas, so many things? There is no question of interpretation.
</div>
</div>
</div>