View source for Unity in variety is real knowledge, and therefore giving up variety artificially does not reflect perfect knowledge of monism

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Unity in variety is real knowledge, and therefore giving up variety artificially does not reflect perfect knowledge of monism"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Nirmal}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2020-12-20T15:30:15Z}}
{{last|2020-12-20T15:30:15Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Unity in Variety]]
[[Category:Real Knowledge]]
[[Category:Therefore]]
[[Category:Give Up]]
[[Category:Artificially]]
[[Category:Does Not]]
[[Category:Reflection]]
[[Category:Perfect Knowledge]]
[[Category:Monism]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 07 Chapter 12 Purports - The Perfect Society: Four Spiritual Classes]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 07 Purports]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>SB Canto 7</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Unity in variety is real knowledge, and therefore giving up variety artificially does not reflect perfect knowledge of monism. According to the acintya-bhedābheda philosophy of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there are varieties, but all of them constitute one unit. Such knowledge is knowledge of perfect oneness.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:SB 7.12.10|SB 7.12.10, Translation and Purport]]
</div>
<div class="quote_translation">
As long as a living entity is not completely self-realized—as long as he is not independent of the misconception of identifying with his body, which is nothing but a reflection of the original body and senses—he cannot be relieved of the conception of duality, which is epitomized by the duality between man and woman. Thus there is every chance that he will fall down because his intelligence is bewildered.
</div>
<div class="text">
Here is another important warning that a man must save himself from attraction to woman. Until one is self-realized, fully independent of the illusory conception of the material body, the duality of man and woman must undoubtedly continue, but when one is actually self-realized this distinction ceases.

<div class="quote_verse">
:vidyā-vinaya-sampanne
:brāhmaṇe gavi hastini
:śuni caiva śvapāke ca 
:paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ
</div>

"The humble sage, by virtue of true knowledge, sees with equal vision a learned and gentle brāhmaṇa, a cow, an elephant, a dog and a dog-eater [outcaste]." ([[Vanisource:BG 5.18 (1972)|BG 5.18]]) On the spiritual platform, the learned person not only gives up the duality of man and woman, but also gives up the duality of man and animal. This is the test of self-realization. One must realize perfectly that the living being is spirit soul but is tasting various types of material bodies. One may theoretically understand this, but when one has practical realization, then he actually becomes a paṇḍita, one who knows. Until that time, the duality continues, and the conception of man and woman also continues. In this stage, one should be extremely careful about mixing with women. No one should think himself perfect and forget the śāstric instruction that one should be very careful about associating even with his daughter, mother or sister, not to speak of other women. Śrīla Madhvācārya cites the following ślokas in this regard:

<div class="quote_verse">
:bahutvenaiva vastūnāṁ
:yathārtha-jñānam ucyate
:advaita-jñānam ity etad 
:dvaita-jñānaṁ tad-anyathā
</div>

:yathā jñānaṁ tathā vastu

<div class="quote_verse">
:yathā vastus tathā matiḥ
:naiva jñānārthayor bhedas 
:tata ekatva-vedanam
</div>

Unity in variety is real knowledge, and therefore giving up variety artificially does not reflect perfect knowledge of monism. According to the acintya-bhedābheda philosophy of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there are varieties, but all of them constitute one unit. Such knowledge is knowledge of perfect oneness.
</div>
</div>
</div>