View source for There are many Indians, but I have no Indian follower here. Of course, in India we have got. That's a different thing. But these, all these American boys, they are cooperating with me. That means they are taking this movement very seriously

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"There are many Indians, but I have no Indian follower here. Of course, in India we have got. That's a different thing. But these, all these American boys, they are cooperating with me. That means they are taking this movement very seriously"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|LindaB}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|09Aug13}}
{{last|15Aug13}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:There Are Many]]
[[Category:Indians]]
[[Category:I Have Not (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Indian]]
[[Category:My Followers (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Here]]
[[Category:Of Course]]
[[Category:India]]
[[Category:I Have Got (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:That Is]]
[[Category:Different]]
[[Category:Thing]]
[[Category:These]]
[[Category:American]]
[[Category:Our Boys (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:We Are (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Cooperate With Me (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Cooperating With The Krsna Consciousness Movement]]
[[Category:That Means...]]
[[Category:Take]]
[[Category:Very Seriously]]
[[Category:Krsna Consciousness Movement Is A Serious Movement]]
[[Category:Devotees in the Krsna Consciousness Movement]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1968_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1968 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1968 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="InterviewFebruary11968LosAngeles_0" class="quote" parent="1968_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="1" link="Interview -- February 1, 1968, Los Angeles" link_text="Interview -- February 1, 1968, Los Angeles">
<div class="heading">Now I am the only man who came from India, and still, I am one. I have no... There are many Indians, but I have no Indian follower here. Of course, in India we have got. That's a different thing. But these, all these American boys, they are cooperating with me. That means they are taking this movement very seriously.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Interview -- February 1, 1968, Los Angeles|Interview -- February 1, 1968, Los Angeles]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Interviewer: About how many followers would you say there are in the United States?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Initiated members, there are about one hundred or little more, but sympathizers, admirers, there are many. Those who come, those who contribute, take sympathy, they help, and in that way there are many followers. But actually initiated members, there are about a little more than one hundred.</p>
<p>Interviewer: What is the significance of... Right after the chanting, everyone bows, and that I don't understand, what they're doing.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. That is offering respect. The whole, our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, is to ask people to surrender to God. They have rebelled against God. Somebody says, "There is no God." Somebody says that "I am God." These nonsense things are to be eradicated from human society. So they should be trained to submit. So the submission is symbolized by bowing down: "Yes, you are great; I am humble." This should be taught. Otherwise, whimsically somebody is thinking that "I am God." They do not know what is God. It is most foolish proposal if somebody claims that he is God. He is dog. We very much hate this proposal, when a man claims that he is God. It is most blasphemous.</p>
<p>Interviewer: Have you... Did you... Well, you've only been over here about four years. But have there been dropouts, out of the movement, of the hundred that were initiated?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: They are doing nicely. They are making progress. They are understanding the philosophy. They are working for it. Now I am the only man who came from India, and still, I am one. I have no... There are many Indians, but I have no Indian follower here. Of course, in India we have got. That's a different thing. But these, all these American boys, they are cooperating with me. That means they are taking this movement very seriously. We have got two great papers, magazines, already, Back to Godhead. One is published from New York, and the other is published from Montreal. (break) In French language. Montreal it is published in French language, and they are well received. Recently I have received one letter from my disciple, Janardana. He is Janus Dambergs, M.A., he is the editor of that paper. He is a very good scholar in French language. His wife is also good scholar, Muna. She is also very good scholar in French language. So they are publishing, and the magazine is well received by the French-speaking people there. And we have contemplation to publish the same magazine in German language also from Germany.</p>
<p>Interviewer: I was talking to one the other day, and he said his name was Tamul.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Tamāla, yes. Tamāla Kṛṣṇa.</p>
<p>Interviewer: Tamāla? And he was from Manhattan. Now, I assume when you join, do you assume a name? Do you change your name?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes, when one is initiated, I give him a name which means remembrance of Kṛṣṇa.</p>
<p>Interviewer: Is it necessary to know of the Indian language when you join? Because I noticed that when your...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: This is not Indian name. This is Sanskrit name.</p>
<p>Interviewer: It's what?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Sanskrit. Sanskrit is a language which is mother of all languages. Sanskrit, S-a-n-s-k-r-i-t, Sanskrit language. So this is the original language of this..., not only of this planet. In other planets also, this language is spoken. So the names are in Sanskrit. They do not belong to any community or any section. It is universal. We have no information. Just like this word, Kṛṣṇa. It is universally known: "all-attractive." The exact English translation is "all-attractive." So there cannot be any proper nomenclature for God than this "all-attractive." Unless God is all-attractive, how He can be God? This is the perfect nomenclature. Similarly, anything Sanskritically named, that is all perfect. Yes.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>