View source for Out of ten children, only Caitanya Mahaprabhu was the living child of Sacima. So naturally she was very, very affection to his son, and Visnupriya, wife, very, very affectionate, beautiful, young - but He gave up. This is called vairagya-vidya

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"out of his ten children, only Caitanya Mahāprabhu was the living child of Śacīmā. So naturally she was very, very affection to his son, and this Viṣṇupriyā, wife, very, very affectionate, beautiful, young—but He gave up. This is called vairāgya-vidyā, no attachment"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2024-06-02T07:25:48.000Z}}
{{last|2024-06-02T07:25:48.000Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Out Of]]
[[Category:Ten]]
[[Category:Children]]
[[Category:Child Caitanya]]
[[Category:Caitanya's Living]]
[[Category:Caitanya and Sacimata]]
[[Category:Naturally]]
[[Category:Very Very]]
[[Category:Affection for Caitanya]]
[[Category:Caitanya As a Son]]
[[Category:Caitanya's Wife - Visnupriya]]
[[Category:Beautiful]]
[[Category:Young]]
[[Category:Caitanya's Giving Up]]
[[Category:This is Called...]]
[[Category:Vairagya-vidya]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SOHAM]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Out of his ten children, only Caitanya Mahāprabhu was the living child of Śacīmā. So naturally she was very, very affection to his son, and this Viṣṇupriyā, wife, very, very affectionate, beautiful, young—but He gave up. This is called vairāgya-vidyā, no attachment. Although there is reason of attachment, but He had no attachment.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:760509 - Lecture SB 06.01.08 - Honolulu|760509 - Lecture SB 06.01.08 - Honolulu]]
</div>
<div class="text">
If there is no mother and there is no good wife, then araṇyaṁ tena gantavyam, immediately he should give up that home. Araṇyam: he should go to the forest. "Why forest? In the city, I have got very nice home, nice building." No. For a person who has no good wife, neither mother, for him, yathāraṇyaṁ tathā gṛham. For him either this home or the forest, it is same.

So Caitanya Mahāprabhu had these two greatest attachment at home. Very affectionate mother. You have read about Śacīmātā's . . . because He was the only . . . out of his ten children, only Caitanya Mahāprabhu was the living child of Śacīmā. So naturally she was very, very affection to his son, and this Viṣṇupriyā, wife, very, very affectionate, beautiful, young—but He gave up. This is called vairāgya-vidyā, no attachment. Although there is reason of attachment, but He had no attachment.

<div class="quote_verse">
:tyaktvā sudustyaja-surepsita rājya-lakṣmīṁ
:dharmiṣṭha ārya-vacasā yad agād araṇyam
:māyā-mṛgaṁ dayitayepsitam anvadhāvad
:vande mahā-puruṣa te caraṇāravindam 
:([[Vanisource:SB 11.5.34|SB 11.5.34]])
</div>

He left home for the benefit of the whole human society. This is vairāgya-vidyā.

So similarly, the Gosvāmīs, they were ministers. They were not ordinary men, Rūpa Gosvāmī, Sanātana Gosvāmī. Practically they were governing the whole affairs of government at that time, a very exalted post. So about them also, it is written by Śrīnivāsācārya, tyaktvā tūrṇam aśeṣa-maṇḍala-pati-śreṇīṁ sadā tuccha-vat (Ṣaḍ-gosvāmy-aṣṭaka 4). Aśeṣa-maṇḍala. Maṇḍala-pati means big, big leaders, big, big leaders of the society. He was minister, so he was associating with big, big men, not ordinary men. But he gave up. He's such a position, minister, drawing high salary, and association all the big, big men of the country or the society. But he gave them up—sadā tuccha-vat, that "What is the use of this?" This is called vairāgya.
</div>
</div>
</div>