View source for How come in the locational, archaeological and ontological records, Krsna consciousness is not mentioned by other religions?

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"archaeological and ontological records, Krsna consciousness is not mentioned by other religions"|"how come in the locational"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Mangalavati|Rishab}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|03Apr11}}
{{last|03Jul12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1975]]
[[Category:Questions On... Other Religions, Religion in General]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="0" parent="Lectures" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures"><h3>Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonBG71NairobiOctober271975_0" class="quote" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" book="Lec" index="246" link="Lecture on BG 7.1 -- Nairobi, October 27, 1975" link_text="Lecture on BG 7.1 -- Nairobi, October 27, 1975">
<div class="heading">Kṛṣṇa consciousness is always there. You are calculating with reference to your age, but Kṛṣṇa consciousness is there. In the Fourth Chapter, you read, imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam: "I spoke this Kṛṣṇa consciousness science first of all to the sun-god." Then how do you say five thousand years? There is reference to the Manu. And if we take the, all these advanced calculation, then it becomes that forty millions of years ago Bhagavad-gītā was spoken by Kṛṣṇa to the sun-god. Have you got forty millions' history? You haven't got even five thousand years' even history. Your history is so imperfect. So don't bring it into historical reference. It is eternal.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 7.1 -- Nairobi, October 27, 1975|Lecture on BG 7.1 -- Nairobi, October 27, 1975]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Indian man (5): Kṛṣṇa consciousness is the oldest teaching of God, or Kṛṣṇa.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. That is mayy āsakta-manāḥ. That is explained.</p>
<p>Indian man (5): But the Gītā was written about five thousand years ago.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No. You have not read Bhagavad-gītā. Did you read? Did you read Bhagavad-gītā?</p>
<p>Indian man (5): Yes, I read some portion.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Then why do you say like that, five thousand years?</p>
<p>Indian man (5): All the scriptures were written (indistinct).</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Hm? What does he say?</p>
<p>Indian man (5): Then how come in the locational(?), archaeological and ontological records, Kṛṣṇa consciousness is not mentioned by other religions?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa consciousness is always there. You are calculating with reference to your age, but Kṛṣṇa consciousness is there. In the Fourth Chapter, you read, imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam: ([[Vanisource:BG 4.1 (1972)|BG 4.1]]) "I spoke this Kṛṣṇa consciousness science first of all to the sun-god." Then how do you say five thousand years? There is reference to the Manu. And if we take the, all these advanced calculation, then it becomes that forty millions of years ago Bhagavad-gītā was spoken by Kṛṣṇa to the sun-god. Have you got forty millions' history? (laughter) You haven't got even five thousand years' even history. Your history is so imperfect. So don't bring it into historical reference. It is eternal. (end)</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>