View source for Do you see hope for mankind in the future?

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Do you see hope for mankind in the future"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SunitaS|Rishab}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|09Aug11}}
{{last|03May12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1976]]
[[Category:Questions From... Journalists, Reporters, Writers]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1976_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="9" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1976 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1976 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="RoomConversationwithReporterJune31976LosAngeles_0" class="quote" parent="1976_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="109" link="Room Conversation with Reporter -- June 3, 1976, Los Angeles" link_text="Room Conversation with Reporter -- June 3, 1976, Los Angeles">
<div class="heading">Yes. Man can be happy immediately provided the consciousness is developed.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Reporter -- June 3, 1976, Los Angeles|Room Conversation with Reporter -- June 3, 1976, Los Angeles]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Rāmeśvara: Half a million.</p>
<p>Reporter: Ah, Swami. What is your purpose here with your ah.... with the faith in seeking the growth and so on.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: (to Rāmeśvara) That is the purpose you can explain.</p>
<p>Rāmeśvara: The purpose of our, of our seeking the growth is so that people all over the world can become happy again. People who are suffering due to lack of knowledge about who they are and what their relationship is with God, and as a result of that ignorance, they're performing so many activities which cause them pain and misery, so that they can become happy again.</p>
<p>Reporter: Ah. How is..., how will this be achieved?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Misery. Misery is caused due to ignorance. They admit or not. The more we are kept in darkness of knowledge, we suffer. What is the difference between ah..., what is called? Developed nations and not developed nations. This America belonged to the Red Indians. And because they are not developed, their condition was developed, ah, different from the present America. They could not construct such big, big house, and big, big roads, and like that because they are in ignorance. That is the difference. Prosperity, no prosperity. Happiness, not happiness. They are ignorance and knowledge.</p>
<p>Reporter: They have.... Is it that they have confused materialism with happiness?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Not Material, I mean, I mean to say. Happiness is knowledge.</p>
<p>Reporter: Hmm.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Happiness is knowledge. Man who is in ignorance, he is suffering, and that you say material and spiritually. A person who is not in developed consciousness, he is suffering. And they commit sinful acts also.</p>
<p>Reporter: I beg your pardon?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: They commit sinful acts also in ignorance. That is the difference between man and animal. Animal means not developed consciousness. They.... Some of them, they say the animal has no soul. That is foolishness. Animal has soul, but the consciousness is not developed. Just like a child. Father's consciousness and the child's consciousness different. Why it is different? The child's consciousness is not developed. Father's consciousness is developed. Because the child is talking some nonsense, you cannot say there is no soul. There is soul, but the consciousness is not developed.</p>
<p>Reporter: Do you see hope for mankind in the future?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. Man can be happy immediately provided the consciousness is developed.</p>
<p>Reporter: Can.... Do you think that this will ever be achieved?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. It can be achieved. Just like I have sent a letter to your government asking them questions that you write on the bills: "In God We Trust." So is it that you trust in God blindly or knowingly? That was my question. Suppose I trust you. So you must be trustworthy. Otherwise why shall I trust you? So this question I asked the government: "You write on the bills, 'In God We Trust,' so what kind of trust is this?" If you actually trust, then you must know that God is trustworthy. Only blindly trust as a slogan. But that letter is not in reply. So what is your opinion? "In God We Trust," but how do you trust, why you trust? This is my question.</p>
<p>Reporter: It would be a matter of faith, I suppose.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Faith may be different. You may have faith, I may not have faith. That is not the question. Just like in the bank you deposit some money. If some may have faith or no faith, but that bank is trustworthy. You know that your money deposited in the bank will not be cheated. Similarly if you trust in God, you must know whether God is trustworthy. Whether.... What do you mean by God? This is not the question of faith. Faith is bad. It is a question of understanding. So that we want, that America-specially you are favorite amongst all other nations; you are well-to-do, richer than other nations—so why don't you take God seriously? Why should you trust in God as faith? No, you understand what is God and have your faith at full, that "God is, yes, trustworthy," so that others may also know that God is trustworthy. That is our mission, that why God entrust? Are we trusting God? Should we.... A slogan. Let it be a fact by scientific study, by scientific understanding. There is way to understand why God is trustworthy. It's not the question of faith. It is a fact.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>