View source for Canakya Pandita says: "What is the use of a son who is neither glorious nor devoted to the Lord? Such a son is like a blind eye, which simply gives pain but cannot help one see"

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"What is the use of a son who is neither glorious nor devoted to the Lord? Such a son is like a blind eye, which simply gives pain but cannot help one see"|"Cāṇakya Paṇḍita also says"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Nirmal}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2020-11-17T16:21:46Z}}
{{last|2020-11-17T16:21:46Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Canakya Pandita]]
[[Category:What Is the Use]]
[[Category:Son]]
[[Category:Who Is]]
[[Category:Neither]]
[[Category:Glorious]]
[[Category:Devotion to God]]
[[Category:Such A]]
[[Category:Likeness]]
[[Category:Blind]]
[[Category:Eyes]]
[[Category:Which]]
[[Category:Simply]]
[[Category:Pain]]
[[Category:Cannot]]
[[Category:Help]]
[[Category:One (as in someone)]]
[[Category:See]]
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Chapter 11 Purports - The Transcendental Qualities of Vrtrasura]]
[[Category:Srimad Bhagavatam, Canto 06 Purports]]
[[Category:Give]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>SB Canto 6</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Tulasī dāsa commented that a son and urine both come from the same channel. In other words, semen and urine both come from the genitals, but semen produces a child whereas urine produces nothing. Therefore if a child is neither a hero nor a devotee, he is not a son but urine. Similarly, Cāṇakya Paṇḍita also says: "What is the use of a son who is neither glorious nor devoted to the Lord? Such a son is like a blind eye, which simply gives pain but cannot help one see."
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:SB 6.11.4|SB 6.11.4, Translation and Purport]]
</div>
<div class="quote_translation">
O demigods, these demoniac soldiers have taken birth uselessly. Indeed, they have come from the bodies of their mothers exactly like stool. What is the benefit of killing such enemies from behind while they are running in fear? One who considers himself a hero should not kill an enemy who is afraid of losing his life. Such killing is never glorious, nor can it promote one to the heavenly planets.
</div>
<div class="text">
Vṛtrāsura rebuked both the demigods and the demoniac soldiers because the demons were running in fear of their lives and the demigods were killing them from behind. The actions of both were abominable. When a fight takes place, the opposing parties must be prepared to fight like heroes. A hero never runs from the field of battle. He always fights face to face, determined to gain victory or lay down his life in the fight. That is heroic. Killing an enemy from behind is also inglorious. When an enemy turns his back and runs in fear of his life, he should not be killed. This is the etiquette of military science.

Vṛtrāsura insulted the demoniac soldiers by comparing them to the stool of their mothers. Both stool and a cowardly son come from the abdomen of the mother, and Vṛtrāsura said that there is no difference between them. A similar comparison was given by Tulasī dāsa, who commented that a son and urine both come from the same channel. In other words, semen and urine both come from the genitals, but semen produces a child whereas urine produces nothing. Therefore if a child is neither a hero nor a devotee, he is not a son but urine. Similarly, Cāṇakya Paṇḍita also says:

<div class="quote_verse">
:ko 'rthaḥ putreṇa jātena
:yo na vidvān na dhārmikaḥ
:kāṇena cakṣuṣā kiṁ vā 
:cakṣuḥ pīḍaiva kevalam
</div>

"What is the use of a son who is neither glorious nor devoted to the Lord? Such a son is like a blind eye, which simply gives pain but cannot help one see."
</div>
</div>
</div>