View source for God is good. Krsna chanted, danced with others' wives at dead of night. Any man who does it, he is immediately a debauch, licentious. But still we worship that rasa-lila

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"God is good. Krsna chanted, danced with others' wives at dead of night. Any man who does it, he is immediately a debauch, licentious. But still we worship that rasa-lila"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Laksmipriya}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|03Nov12}}
{{last|03Nov12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:God is Good]]
[[Category:Krsna]]
[[Category:Chanting]]
[[Category:Dancing]]
[[Category:With Others]]
[[Category:Wife]]
[[Category:Dead of Night]]
[[Category:Any]]
[[Category:Man]]
[[Category:Who]]
[[Category:Does]]
[[Category:Immediately]]
[[Category:Debauch]]
[[Category:Licentious]]
[[Category:But Still]]
[[Category:Worship]]
[[Category:That]]
[[Category:Rasa-lila]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Philosophy_Discussions" class="sub_section" sec_index="13" parent="Lectures" text="Philosophy Discussions"><h3>Philosophy Discussions</h3>
</div>
<div id="PhilosophyDiscussiononJohnStuartMill_0" class="quote" parent="Philosophy_Discussions" book="Lec" index="8" link="Philosophy Discussion on John Stuart Mill" link_text="Philosophy Discussion on John Stuart Mill">
<div class="heading">God is good. Kṛṣṇa chanted, danced with others' wives at dead of night. Any man who does it, he is immediately a debauch, licentious. But still we worship that rasa-līlā. We worship that rasa-līlā. We keep the picture of God's dancing with others' wives. That is God. In all circumstances, God is good. That is worshipable.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on John Stuart Mill|Philosophy Discussion on John Stuart Mill]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Śyāmasundara: Competition. But in order to compete, there has to be freedom.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. That is another thing. But nobody is independent. That is our point of view. Everyone is dependent. Somebody is voluntarily dependent on Kṛṣṇa and somebody is by force dependent on māyā. That's all. But he must be dependent.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: He says in this way that society should be organized so that there is freedom of belief, freedom to unite, freedom of taste, freedom of competition. But one individual's freedom should not encroach upon another individual's freedom.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Then why they are killing? The freedom of the poor animals, why they encroach on the freedom of others? Īśāvāsyam idaṁ sarvaṁ mā gṛdhaḥ kasya svid dhanam ([[Vanisource:ISO 1|ISO 1]]). Do not encroach upon others' freedom. That is Vedic injunction. That is nice. But why these people are encroaching upon the freedom of these animals? The birds, they are flying, freedom, the ducks. Why they kill? Encroaching upon other's freedom. Without any harm, the birds are flying, without... If you kill an aggressor then you are right. Suppose somebody is coming to kill you, then you kill first. That is good. But if somebody's not doing anything harm to you, and if you kill, then what is this philosophy? What is this philosophy? Give him some bad name, because I have to kill him. "Oh, he has no soul." You can attack, he has no consciousness, you have no soul. You can attack him. Why you are killing? Let him kill you. So far this philosophy of religion, he says that God is good, but that he is involved in a world which is not his own making. That God didn't create the world, but that he is involved with it. Then we should be judged by Mill. God is good, but not as good as he thinks he is. That is his opinion about God.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: No. God is... God is good...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: God is good in all conditions, or God is good when Stuart Mill accepts? What is the position of God?</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: He says that the presence of evil indicates that if God were everything, that He would be not so good.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Why? Therefore God has to depend on the free will or on the opinion of Mr. Mill? Is  that? He says that God is not so good. God is good, but not so good because he does not approve all of His activities.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: No. He says that God is good, but He is limited in His power; otherwise everything would be good.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: How nonsense he is! And he is philosopher. He is making God limited, and he is philosopher. Just see.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: He says if God were good then everything would be good.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Everything is good! That is our philosophy. When the God kills the demons, immediately flowers are showered upon Him from the sky. You have not read in...? He is good. He is always good. He has no idea of God, and still he poses himself as philosopher. God is good. Kṛṣṇa chanted, danced with others' wives at dead of night. Any man who does it, he is immediately a debauch, licentious. But still we worship that rasa-līlā. We worship that rasa-līlā. We keep the picture of God's dancing with others' wives. That is God. In all circumstances, God is good. That is worshipable. That is idea of God. Not that I put Him under my judgment: "Oh, yes, you are good, but not so good." Then I am a fool. I create my own God. "I am better than God. I can create God." No. God creates you. You cannot create God.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: He says that because there is evil present in the world, that this shows...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: But he does not know what is evil, what is good. He should know what is created by God is good, even if it appears to be evil to us. That is conception of God. I may think it is evil, but it is good. I do not know how it is good—that is my fault. That is my fault. But it is good. If I put God under my discrimination, under my judgment, that He is not good. He is not God; He is dog. God cannot be under my judgment. God is good always.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: So that's all for John Stuart Mill.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>