View source for The serious offense was committed by a foolish child only; therefore he deserved to be pardoned by the Supreme Lord, although it was not possible to get free from the sinful reaction

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"The serious offense was committed by a foolish child only; therefore he deserved to be pardoned by the Supreme Lord, although it was not possible to get free from the sinful reaction"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|06Jul12}}
{{last|06Jul12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Serious]]
[[Category:Commit Offenses]]
[[Category:Was]]
[[Category:By]]
[[Category:Foolish]]
[[Category:Children]]
[[Category:Only]]
[[Category:Therefore]]
[[Category:Deserve]]
[[Category:To Be]]
[[Category:Pardon]]
[[Category:Supreme Lord]]
[[Category:Although]]
[[Category:It Is Not Possible]]
[[Category:Get]]
[[Category:Free from Reaction]]
[[Category:SInful Reactions]]
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
</div>
<div id="SB_Canto_1" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 1"><h3>SB Canto 1</h3>
</div>
<div id="SB11849_0" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_1" book="SB" index="739" link="SB 1.18.49" link_text="SB 1.18.49">
<div class="heading">Mahārāja Parīkṣit's garlanding the sage with a dead snake was not at all a very serious offense, but Śṛṅgi's cursing the King was a serious offense. The serious offense was committed by a foolish child only; therefore he deserved to be pardoned by the Supreme Lord, although it was not possible to get free from the sinful reaction.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 1.18.49|SB 1.18.49, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">The sage thus regretted the sin committed by his own son. He did not take the insult paid by the King very seriously.</p>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>The whole incident is now cleared up. Mahārāja Parīkṣit's garlanding the sage with a dead snake was not at all a very serious offense, but Śṛṅgi's cursing the King was a serious offense. The serious offense was committed by a foolish child only; therefore he deserved to be pardoned by the Supreme Lord, although it was not possible to get free from the sinful reaction. Mahārāja Parīkṣit also did not mind the curse offered to him by a foolish brāhmaṇa. On the contrary, he took full advantage of the awkward situation, and by the great will of the Lord, Mahārāja Parīkṣit achieved the highest perfection of life through the grace of Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī. Actually it was the desire of the Lord, and Mahārāja Parīkṣit, Ṛṣi Śamīka and his son Śṛṅgi were all instrumental in fulfilling the desire of the Lord. So none of them were put into difficulty because everything was done in relation with the Supreme Person.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>