View source for SB 06.01.20 atra codaharantimam... cited

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"atra codaharantimam"|"dutanam visnu-yamayoh"|"itihasam puratanam"|"samvadas tam nibodha me"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SunitaS}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|16Sep11}}
{{last|16Sep11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=4|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|5}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam Canto 06 - Cited Verses]]
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
</div>
<div id="SB_Canto_6" class="sub_section" sec_index="6" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 6"><h3>SB Canto 6</h3>
</div>
<div id="SB6120_0" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_6" book="SB" index="19" link="SB 6.1.20" link_text="SB 6.1.20">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 6.1.20|SB 6.1.20, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">In this regard, learned scholars and saintly persons describe a very old historical incident involving a discussion between the order carriers of Lord Viṣṇu and those of Yamarāja. Please hear of this from me.</p>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>The Purāṇas, or old histories, are sometimes neglected by unintelligent men who consider their descriptions mythological. Actually, the descriptions of the Purāṇas, or the old histories of the universe, are factual, although not chronological. The purāṇas record the chief incidents that have occurred over many millions of years, not only on this planet but also on other planets within the universe. Therefore all learned and realized Vedic scholars speak with references to the incidents in the Purāṇas. Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī accepts the Purāṇas to be as important as the Vedas themselves. Therefore in Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu he quotes the following verse from the Brahma-yāmala:</p>
:śruti-smṛti-purāṇādi-
:pañcarātra-vidhiṁ vinā
:aikāntikī harer bhaktir
:utpātāyaiva kalpate
:(Brs. 1.2.101)
<p>"Devotional service of the Lord that ignores the authorized Vedic literatures like the Upaniṣads, purāṇas and Nārada Pañcarātra is simply an unnecessary disturbance in society." A devotee of Kṛṣṇa must refer not only to the Vedas, but also to the purāṇas. One should not foolishly consider the Purāṇas mythological. If they were mythological, Śukadeva Gosvāmī would not have taken the trouble to recite the old historical incidents concerning the life of Ajāmila. Now the history begins as follows.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Lectures" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures"><h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB6119andRoomConversationBombayNovember151970_0" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="624" link="Lecture on SB 6.1.19 and Room Conversation -- Bombay, November 15, 1970" link_text="Lecture on SB 6.1.19 and Room Conversation -- Bombay, November 15, 1970">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.19 and Room Conversation -- Bombay, November 15, 1970|Lecture on SB 6.1.19 and Room Conversation -- Bombay, November 15, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">For this reason the temple is situated. In the temple generally ordinary man, woman, they come to see the Deities, hear the chanting, and sometimes play some instrument. All these help him progressing toward devotional service. Niveśitaṁ tad-guṇa-rāgī yair iha. Śrīdhara Svami says, bhaktiḥ svalpāpi punāti: "Bhakti, devotional service, is so nice that even it is done very little, still it purifies." Just like fire. Even a small fire can burn wherever it is placed. Tasya guṇeṣu rāga-mātram asti na tu janānām. Śrīdhāra Svāmī says, "Simply a little attraction for Kṛṣṇa, not full knowledge even, simply a little attraction, can purify one from all sinful reaction."</p>
:atra codāharantīmam
:itihāsaṁ purātanam
:dūtānāṁ viṣṇu-yamayoḥ
:saṁvādas taṁ nibodha me
<p>Now he again says that "Those who are attracted to devotional service of Kṛṣṇa even to a very little extent, for them," na te yamaṁ pāśa-bhṛtaś ca tad-bhaṭān svapne 'pi paśyanti hi cīrṇa-niṣkṛtāḥ, "they do not even dream the Yamarāja or his constables." Because at the time of death those who are very sinful, they are taken away to Yamarāja's place... That's a fact. Not only that, he even in dream does not see them because that little service to Kṛṣṇa has made him freed from all sinful contamination. (Hindi) The very word is used, cīrṇa-niṣkṛtāḥ.</p>
:atra codāharanti imam
:itihāsaṁ purātanam
:dūtānāṁ viṣṇu-yamayoḥ
:saṁvādas taṁ nibodha me
<p>Now Śukadeva Gosvāmī is giving an example from the history. Now it is explicitly stated here, itihāsaṁ purāṇam. All the Purāṇas that we have got, they are not legends; they are all history. They are all histories. Just like there is no chronological history one after another, but any incident which has taken actually place, they are reciting. They are not fiction or imaginary stories, all the Purāṇas. Itihāsa, yes. So Śukadeva Gosvāmī is giving an instance from the history which is very instructive. Atra codāharantīmam itihāsaṁ purātanam. Purāṇa means old history, actually Purāṇa. Purāṇa means old. So purātaṇam itihāsam. Now he gives that,</p>
:kānyakubje dvijaḥ kaścid
:dāsī-patir ajāmilaḥ
:nāmnā naṣṭa-sadācāro
:dāsyāḥ saṁsarga-dūṣitaḥ
<p>He says, "In the city of Kānyakubja..." Kānyakubja is still existing. That is also historical place. That place is now known as Kanauj. Yes. (some discussion in Hindi) "In the city of Kānyakubja, formerly there was a brāhmaṇa." Kānyakubje dvijaḥ kaścit. "There was a brāhmaṇa." Āsīd dāsī-patir ajāmilaḥ. Dāsī-pati means one who keeps woman; it is not married. He kept one woman, dāsī; therefore he was the husband of a dāsī. He was living with a woman who was not married wife. So a brāhmaṇa of the name Ajāmila who was husband of a kept woman, kānyakubje dvijaḥ kaścid dāsī-patir ajāmilaḥ, nāmnā naṣṭa-sadācāraḥ. But he lost all good qualification of a brāhmaṇa. That is the result of illegitimate connection with woman.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB6120ChicagoJuly41975_1" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="627" link="Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975" link_text="Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975|Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Nitāi: Translation. "In this connection, the learned scholars and saintly persons give as an example the description of one very old historical incident, wherein a discussion takes place between the order-carriers of Lord Viṣṇu and the order-carriers of Yamarāja. Please try and understand it as I describe it to you."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda:</p>
:atra codāharantīmam
:itihāsaṁ purātanam
:dūtānāṁ viṣṇu-yamayoḥ
:saṁvādas taṁ nibodha me
:([[Vanisource:SB 6.1.20|SB 6.1.20]])
<p>So here is, one example is given, itihāsa. Itihāsa means history. The Vedic system of itihāsa, it is not the modern history. Modern... Itihāsa means some incidence which took place long, long ago, and such incidence is very beneficial to hear so that we can follow. That is called itihāsa. It is not chronological record of all incidences. Only important things. Purātanam. Purātanam means old and important. So Śukadeva Gosvāmī is explaining to Parīkṣit Mahārāja how important is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Now he is giving one incidence of history—example is better than precept—how Ajāmila was saved simply by chanting once..., not once, many times, Nārāyaṇa. That is the itihāsaṁ purātanam. In the Vedic literatures there are itihāsas, or histories. Just like Mahābhārata. Mahābhārata is the history. Bhārata means India, and Mahā means greater. Greater India. Just like modern age they use "Greater Britain," "Greater this," so many, same thing. Mahābhārata means "Greater..." Mahā means great, and Bhārata means India. "The history of Greater India." Although India is very small now in comparison to... Although it is called subcontinent, still, in comparison to your America or Africa, it is very small. But formerly it was not so small. Greater India means India and outside also. And so far we collect records from the Mahābhārata, part of Europe, also India. Up to Greek and Rome. Therefore it is called Mahābhārata. And when there was the Battle of Kurukṣetra, all kings and rulers from different parts of the world, they joined either this party or that party. The Kaurava, the dynasty of the Kurus, they were ruling all over the world. The capital was Hastināpura, which is now known as New Delhi. It is very old. And the emperor, up to Mahārāja Parīkṣit, they were ruling all over the world. There was one flag, not many flags. Therefore it is called Mahābhārata.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB6120ChicagoJuly41975_2" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="627" link="Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975" link_text="Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975|Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Chicago, July 4, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So one Ajāmila was delivered by chanting Nārāyaṇa's name, you can deliver many millions of Ajāmila. The process is the same. The process has not changed. Therefore he is quoting that itihāsam atra codāharanti imam itihāsaṁ purātanam. It is spiritual. It is not that now the mode has changed. No. What was potent millions of years ago, that is potent still. That is spiritual. It does not change. Therefore it is said, itihāsaṁ purātanam. Although it is very old, but the effect is the same, effect is the same. In the old times people used to eat and get satisfaction; the same satisfaction is now also. You eat; you feel satisfaction. Eating, sleeping, mating and defending—this is the material necessities. So the such necessities were in the old, millions of years ago, and those necessities are still there. It is no change actually. So this is the process how to... They are now thinking, "Why there is crime, and why, what is the remedy?" They are think in the material way. They are thinking that "We have got enough everything. Why there should be crime?" But they do not know that unless you make first-class men by training, the fourth-class man will degrade more and more. Just like a child, if you don't send him to school to get education, he will be street boy and degrade more and more. So this is the problem. So how to train first-class man, that method is here, Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement. And take it seriously, and if you actually love your countrymen, raise them to the standard of first-class man.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB6120HonoluluMay201976_3" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="628" link="Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Honolulu, May 20, 1976" link_text="Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Honolulu, May 20, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Honolulu, May 20, 1976|Lecture on SB 6.1.20 -- Honolulu, May 20, 1976]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, Canto Six, Chapter One, verse number twenty? Is that the number, twenty? (devotees repeat)</p>
:atra codāharantīmam
:itihāsaṁ purātanam
:dūtānāṁ viṣṇu-yamayoḥ
:saṁvādas taṁ nibodha me
:([[Vanisource:SB 6.1.20|SB 6.1.20]])
<p>"In this regard, learned scholars and saintly persons describe a very old historical incident involving a discussion between the order carriers of Lord Viṣṇu and those of Yamarāja. Please hear of this from me."</p>
<p>So Yamarāja is the superintendent or the judge for considering what kind of punishment should be given to a certain sinful person. After death, those who are sinful, they are taken to Yamarāja for judgment, what kind of punishment one has to be given. And those who are pious devotees, they are taken charge by the Viṣṇudūta. I think the Christian doctrine, that in this life either you go to hell or go to heaven. Is it not?</p>
<p>Devotee: Yes.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That is nice. The same thing. This human form of life is a chance. Actually, in this material world we are all suffering. Duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam ([[Vanisource:BG 8.15|BG 8.15]]). You cannot make it a happy place. That is not possible. Kṛṣṇa says, who has created this material world, He says, duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam ([[Vanisource:BG 8.15|BG 8.15]]). Duḥkha means unhappiness; ālayam means place. Duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam. That is also temporary. Duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam, nāpnuvanti mahātmānāṁ saṁsiddhiṁ paramāṁ gatāḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 8.15|BG 8.15]]). So this is place of duḥkhālayam. Any commonsense man can understand that Kṛṣṇa says in the Bhagavad-gītā... You may challenge, "Where is the unhappiness? We are very happy." Madmen. Kṛṣṇa points out, "No, it is not place of happiness." Why it is not place of happiness? Now, janma-mṛtyu-jarā vyādhi-duḥkha-dośānudarśanam ([[Vanisource:BG 13.9|BG 13.9]]). Why don't you see the real unhappiness? This is real duḥkha, or unhappiness. What is that? Janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi. You have to die. You have to take birth within the womb with so much risk that even your mother can kill you. Is it very happiness? At the present moment the mother... When the child sleeps very peacefully, that "I am on the lap of my mother," now the time has come when the mother is killing the child. So is it very happiness place? That you cannot trust even your mother, what to speak of others. The time has come, degraded, that... Naturally a child, he thinks, "I am safe now with my mother." But the Kali-yuga is so cruel that even with mother you are not safe. And still you say it is a place of happiness? This is called illusion. It is not place.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>