View source for There's another article in here about the Bhaktivedanta Institute. Have you seen it?

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"There's another article in here about the Bhaktivedanta Institute. Have you seen it"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SunitaS}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|17Aug11}}
{{last|17Aug11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1977]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1977_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="10" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1977 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1977 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="ConversationsApril191977Bombay_0" class="quote" parent="1977_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="144" link="Conversations -- April 19, 1977, Bombay" link_text="Conversations -- April 19, 1977, Bombay">
<div class="heading">No.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Conversations -- April 19, 1977, Bombay|Conversations -- April 19, 1977, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: "It was started nine years ago near Pondicherry with the same target of fifty thousand but has still a population of only four hundred, mostly foreigners." In other words, this is... The idea is that just as Auroville is a farce, any one of us, we're also farcical.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. That is... It is very good farce. That is the... Yes.</p>
<p>Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes, that's the implication.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes.</p>
<p>Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: It's a farce. There's no... From what I can see here, there's no mention in the whole thing... It never mentions "International Society for Krishna Consciousness." It never mentions "Founder-Ācārya His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami." It doesn't even mention...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No.</p>
<p>Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: "...Hare Krishna Movement." In one place it says, "Hare Krishna followers," but it never says, "the Hare Krishna movement." No one knows what ISKCON is. In India they don't know.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: And your name is mentioned in every line, your photograph, as if you are doing everything.</p>
<p>Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: There's another article in here about the Bhaktivedanta Institute. Have you seen it?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No.</p>
<p>Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: It appears just below this article. "ISKCON Branch in City from October, by a staff reporter. A branch of the Bhaktivedanta Institute, the center for advanced learning and research of the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, ISKCON, based in Washington, D.C., is scheduled to be opened in October at Hare Krishna Land in Juhu. This was stated by Dr. Thoudam Dāmodara Singh in Bombay on Tuesday. Dr. Singh, who is in charge of the arrangements for the opening, told a press conference that the Institute presents in a modern format the higher sciences of the ancient Vedantic literatures. In Bombay, Dr. Singh said, the Institute will publish scientific articles, monographs, and the journal 'Sa-vijñānam, Scientific Knowledge,' regularly." That's the whole article. Again Your Divine Grace's name is not mentioned. Of course, it says, "Bhaktivedanta Institute," but still, it's not... Yeah, it was a very good opportunity that we could present our program, but somehow it... Where did they get these figures of "three years"and "ten years"? I mean, how could they have just concocted "three years" and "ten years" unless you told them?</p>
<p>Surabhīr Abhipālayantam: I...</p>
<p>Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: But how did they get these figures? How does someone manufacture that we will spend seventy crores in three years? (pause) It seems like they have tricked you. You must have made a statement, and they...</p>
<p>Surabhīr Abhipālayantam: They fabricated. That's the whole thing.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: How they can fabricate in their own way? From... (pause) Rather, they have criticized that "This fantastic thing, it is going to be like Aurobindo's city, list of fifty thousand, 404 acres." They are not taking it very seriously. Otherwise why he has remarked? Indirectly he has said, "This man is speaking like lunatic." They are not taking very seriously. That very remark shows that "It is going to be meet the same fate." So many fantastic ideas.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>