User contributions for PoojaA
29 July 2022
- 02:5802:58, 29 July 2022 diff hist +1,472 I taste the bliss to which the object of love is entitled. But the pleasure of Radha, the abode of that love, is ten million times greater No edit summary current
- 02:5802:58, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,028 Here in this world we find that the object of love and the lover both are the cheater and the cheated in their reciprocal dealings. That is our experience No edit summary current
- 02:5702:57, 29 July 2022 diff hist +6,237 Object of love is Krsna No edit summary current
28 July 2022
- 10:3710:37, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,988 Whether Arjuna accepted the Vedic conclusion that there is an atomic soul, or whether he did not believe in the existence of the soul, he had no reason to lament. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:3610:36, 28 July 2022 diff hist +6,988 So long you come, do not come to Krsna consciousness, your, these two business will go on, lamenting and hankering. And as soon as you come to Krsna consciousness, you become joyful. There is no reason of lamenting No edit summary current
- 10:3510:35, 28 July 2022 diff hist +4,110 Whether one believes in the existence of the soul, or one does not believe in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation for loss of the body. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:3410:34, 28 July 2022 diff hist +5,620 The Vedic wisdom encourages self-realization on the basis of the nonexistence of the material body. in either case, whether one believes in the existence of the soul or one does not believe in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 10:3310:33, 28 July 2022 diff hist +4,086 Nonbelievers in the existence of the soul are called atheists by followers of Vedic wisdom. Yet even if, for argument's sake, we accept the atheistic theory, there is still no cause for lamentation. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:3210:32, 28 July 2022 diff hist +5,646 Krsna said, "You (gopis) will understand that you are always with Me and that there is no cause of lamentation in our being separated from one another" No edit summary current
- 10:3110:31, 28 July 2022 diff hist +6,342 Krsna continued, "Here also I am not the proprietor of anything, but am always penniless. There is no cause to lament for such a penniless condition; I possessed nothing in the past, so why should I lament that I do not possess anything at present" No edit summary current
- 10:2910:29, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,878 If, however, you think that the soul is perpetually born and always dies, still you have no reason to lament, O mighty-armed. BG 2.26 - 1972 No edit summary current
- 10:2810:28, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,947 If you (Arjuna) think that the soul (or the symptoms of life) is always born and dies forever, you still have no reason to lament, O mighty-armed No edit summary current
- 10:2710:27, 28 July 2022 diff hist +5,261 There was no cause for lamentation by Arjuna on account of death, neither for Bhisma or for Drona, for whom he was so much concerned. Rather, he should rejoice for their changing bodies from old to new ones, thereby rejuvenating their energy. BG 1972 pur No edit summary current
- 10:2610:26, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,871 Even if Arjuna did not believe in the existence of the soul - as in the Vaibhasika philosophy - there would still have been no cause for lamentation. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:2610:26, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,981 Accepting that there are two classes of philosophers, one believing in the existence of soul and the other not believing in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation in either case. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:2410:24, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,152 There is no cause of lamentation because the living entity can neither be killed as he is, nor can the material body, which cannot be saved for any length of time, be permanently protected. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
27 July 2022
- 02:5802:58, 27 July 2022 diff hist −9 Their (Krsna's, Arjuna's and the assembled kings') individuality existed in the past, and their individuality will continue in the future without interruption. Therefore, there is no cause for lamentation for anyone. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 02:5802:58, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,626 Nonbelievers in the existence of the soul are called atheists by followers of Vedic wisdom. Yet even if for argument's sake we accept the atheistic theory, there is still no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 02:5702:57, 27 July 2022 diff hist +4,829 Hearing the words of the dead son (of Srivasa Thakura), all the members of Srivasa Thakura’s family received transcendental knowledge. Thus there was no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 02:5702:57, 27 July 2022 diff hist +2,995 For a ksatriya, a military man, shooting arrows at the enemy is considered transcendental, and refraining from such a duty is demoniac. Therefore, there was no cause for Arjuna to lament. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 02:5602:56, 27 July 2022 diff hist −9 Bhisma and Drona, being noble souls, were surely going to have either spiritual bodies in the next life, or at least life in heavenly bodies for superior enjoyment of material existence. So, in either case, there was no cause of lamentation. BG 1972 pur No edit summary current
- 02:5502:55, 27 July 2022 diff hist +24,935 Because of the existence of the mind and intelligence on Brahmaloka, its residents have feelings of happiness and distress, but there is no cause of lamentation from old age, death, fear or distress No edit summary current
- 02:5502:55, 27 July 2022 diff hist +2,351 As the soul transmigrates, one who has taken birth must give up the present body, and then he must certainly accept another body. This should be no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 02:5402:54, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,603 Accepting that there are two classes of philosophers, one believing in the existence of the soul and the other not believing in its existence, there is no cause for lamentation in either case No edit summary current
- 02:5102:51, 27 July 2022 diff hist +2,322 My dear Vaisnava, seeing a person like you is the perfection of one's eyesight, touching your lotus feet is the perfection of the sense of touch, and glorifying your good qualities is the tongue's real activity No edit summary current
- 02:5102:51, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,173 Activities of the material world means to act in such a way that you become liberated at the end and go back to home, back to Godhead. That is real activities of this material world No edit summary current
- 02:4902:49, 27 July 2022 diff hist +4,721 Then as soon as relationship (sambandha) is understood, then our real activity begins. That real activities is called bhakti, and the material activities, which is not bhakti, that is maya No edit summary current
- 02:4902:49, 27 July 2022 diff hist +2,739 The spirit, spirit soul is active. You cannot stop it. You cannot stop it. Now it is acting through the coverings of material, matter, therefore it is imperfect activities. But if the activity is uncovered by material things that is real activity No edit summary current
- 02:4802:48, 27 July 2022 diff hist +11 When the mirror of intelligence is polished, the real activities of the living entity begin No edit summary current
- 02:4702:47, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,370 The conditioned soul has forgotten the real activities of his original position. However, this is not the case with Krsna. Krsna's name and His person are identical No edit summary current
- 02:4602:46, 27 July 2022 diff hist +2,861 The change (of heart) must be manifested in terms of one’s real activities No edit summary current
- 02:4602:46, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,648 In fact, we are engaged in real activities for obtaining the ultimate happiness in life. If one is not trained to satisfy the spiritual senses and continues in material sense gratification, he will never obtain happiness that is eternal and blissful No edit summary current
- 02:4502:45, 27 July 2022 diff hist +3,244 Building is not very important. Work is important. Activity is important. I started my movement not with buildings, but real activity. So building is opulence. You can do without opulence. You can start anything, even underneath a tree No edit summary current
- 02:4402:44, 27 July 2022 diff hist +4,228 Real activity means No edit summary current
- 02:3502:35, 27 July 2022 diff hist +3,853 When there is something fearful the child, it is nature, closes the eyes. I have practical experience. When I was young man I went to the zoo with my little son and as soon as there was a tiger cage, oh, the child closed the eyes No edit summary current
- 02:3402:34, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,274 I was a young man in 1922 and I was also misled in so many ways. But my spiritual master saved me, Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Gosvami Maharaja No edit summary current
- 02:3302:33, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,529 I was a newly married young man, addicted to Gandhi's movement and dressed in khadi. Fortunately, even at our first meeting His Divine Grace advised me to preach the cult of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu in English in the Western countries No edit summary current
- 02:3202:32, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,875 His Divine Grace, my spiritual master, somehow or other liked me, that I should take up this responsibility. And on the first day I met him, I was at (that) time a very young man, a nationalist, and engaged in a very responsible office No edit summary current
- 02:3102:31, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,661 Fifty years ago I was a young man, but that time has been taken and cannot be returned. The spiritual knowledge I received from my spiritual master, however, cannot be taken away, but will go with me No edit summary current
- 02:3002:30, 27 July 2022 diff hist +7,598 At that time, I was a young man and a nationalist, admirer of Mahatma Gandhi and C.R. Dass No edit summary current
- 02:2502:25, 27 July 2022 diff hist +3,376 She (Sukanya) was a faithful and chaste wife No edit summary current
- 02:2502:25, 27 July 2022 diff hist +4,231 She (Devahuti) served him (Kardama Muni) with great love and affection, and she knew how to please him. Therefore, she is designated here (SB 3.23.1) as sadhvi, which means "a chaste, faithful wife." Her rare example is the ideal of Vedic civilization No edit summary
- 02:2102:21, 27 July 2022 diff hist +4,600 If the husband is first class and the wife is chaste and faithful, then the home is heaven. This is the formula No edit summary current
26 July 2022
- 03:2203:22, 26 July 2022 diff hist +3,645 The Aditya Purana, Markandeya Purana and Padma Purana tell about a brahmana who was suffering from leprosy but had a very chaste and faithful wife No edit summary current
- 03:2203:22, 26 July 2022 diff hist +9,766 Not only should a woman be faithful and chaste to her husband, but she should also be affectionate to the friends of her husband, obedient to the father and mother of her husband, and affectionate to the younger brothers of her husband No edit summary current
- 03:1403:14, 26 July 2022 diff hist +3,173 A chaste and faithful woman must not practice adultery - that is a greatly sinful act No edit summary current
- 02:1702:17, 26 July 2022 diff hist +3,912 The enchanting vibration of His (Krsna's) songs became a great impediment to the young girls, who were supposed to remain chaste and faithful to their husbands No edit summary current
- 02:1702:17, 26 July 2022 diff hist +1,817 The Asvini-kumaras were very pleased to see Sukanya's chastity and faithfulness. Thus they showed her Cyavana Muni, her husband, and after taking permission from him, they returned to the heavenly planets in their plane No edit summary current
- 02:0402:04, 26 July 2022 diff hist +2,931 As stated in the sastra, the results of a husband's pious activities are shared by his wife. A woman's duty is to be very chaste and faithful to her husband. Then without separate endeavor she will share in all the profit the husband earns No edit summary current
- 02:0302:03, 26 July 2022 diff hist +3,212 According to Vedic culture, a woman must accept the husband given to her by her parents and remain chaste and faithful to him. Therefore King Saryati was surprised to see a young man by the side of Sukanya No edit summary