Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Special

Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide anonymous users | Show my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits
Show new changes starting from 19:33, 8 June 2024
   
 
Page name:
List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

8 June 2024

7 June 2024

     13:21  King Puranjana was a representative of King Pracinabarhisat, and Narada Muni was reminding King Pracinabarhisat of his forefather, Maharaja Prthu, who never chastised a brahmana or a Vaisnava diffhist +13 Deepali talk contribs
N    11:59  Puri - another of my Godbrothers. He was duplicate number one. So he was appointed acarya. Whatever he may be, Guru Maharaja never designated any acarya. And the Sridhara Maharaja, he was the principal man to support him diffhist +3,311 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Purī—another of my Godbrothers. He was duplicate (sic) number one"|"So he was appointed ācārya. Whatever he may be, Guru Mahārāja never designated any ācārya. And the Śrīdhara Mahārāja, he was the principal man to support him"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-06-07T11:59:42.000Z}} {{last|2024-06-07T11:59:42.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}} {{total|...")
N    11:52  That is my charge (disobeying my Guru Maharaja) against them (my godbrothers). Deliberately. He (Guru Maharaja) never appointed an acarya. First of all they appointed one acarya, you see, and later on he proved to be a rascal diffhist +2,996 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"That is my charge against them. Deliberately. He never appointed an ācārya. First of all they appointed one ācārya, you see, and later on he proved to be a rascal"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-06-07T11:52:15.000Z}} {{last|2024-06-07T11:52:15.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Charge Category:Disobeying a Spiritual...")

6 June 2024

5 June 2024

4 June 2024

N    21:29  She (Devahuti) never said that "I am king's daughter. I was raised in so opulent condition of life. Now I have got a husband who cannot give me a nice apartment, nice food. Divorce him." No. That was never done. That is not the position‎‎ 2 changes history +3,213 [Soham‎ (2×)]
     
21:29 (cur | prev) +6 Soham talk contribs
N    
21:29 (cur | prev) +3,207 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"She never said that "I am king's daughter. I was raised in so opulent condition of life. Now I have got a husband who cannot give me a nice apartment, nice food. Divorce him." No. That was never done. That is not the position."}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-06-04T21:29:18.000Z}} {{last|2024-06-04T21:29:18.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc ri...")
     05:24  Because Prthu Maharaja's wife (Arci) was the Queen and also a daughter of a king, she never experienced walking on the ground, for queens used to never come out of the palace diffhist −37 Deepali talk contribs

3 June 2024

     07:50  Dear King (Prthu), Indra's powers are already reduced due to his attempt to impede the execution of your sacrifice. We (the priests) shall call him by Vedic mantras which were never before used, and certainly he will come diffhist −19 Deepali talk contribs
     07:33  Prthu was special in that although he was given license to remain a householder, and although he possessed immense opulences in his kingdom, he never engaged in sense gratification. This was a special sign that indicated him to be a pure devotee of God diffhist −51 Deepali talk contribs
     07:25  Maharaja Prthu was never a worshiper of the impersonal Brahman but was at all times a pure devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Bhagavati brahmani refers to one who is engaged in devotional service to the Personality of Godhead diffhist +13 Deepali talk contribs
     06:21  Maharaja Prthu is likened to the sun (arka-vat). Sometimes the sun shines on stool, urine and so many other polluted things, but since the sun is all-powerful, it is never affected by the polluted things with which it associates diffhist −45 Deepali talk contribs

2 June 2024

     15:35  If we do not live according to the injunctions of the sastras, the Vedas, we shall never achieve success in life, to say nothing of happiness or elevation to higher statuses of living diffhist −13 Visnu Murti talk contribs
     03:55  O brahmana (Narada), O master, I (Yudhisthira) have never heard of such a contradiction as an affectionate father's punishing his noble son with the intention of killing him. Kindly dissipate our doubts in this regard diffhist −8 Nabakumar talk contribs
     03:54 Move log Nabakumar talk contribs moved page O brahmana, O master, I have never heard of such a contradiction as an affectionate father's punishing his noble son with the intention of killing him. Kindly dissipate our doubts in this regard to O brahmana (Narada), O master, I (Yudhisthira) have never heard of such a contradiction as an affectionate father's punishing his noble son with the intention of killing him. Kindly dissipate our doubts in this regard

1 June 2024

31 May 2024

30 May 2024

N    16:51  So-called rascal scientists will give bluff, that "We are making solution of all problem." It is never solved. It will never be solved in future also, unless we take to Krsna consciousness. That is a fact. If you like, you can take it; otherwise suffer diffhist +5,550 SharmisthaK talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"so-called rascal scientists will give us bluff, that"|"We are making solution of all problem"|"It is never solved. It will never be solved in the future also, unless we take to Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is a fact. If you like, you can take it; otherwise suffer"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-05-30T16:51:23.000Z}} {{last|2024-05-30T16:51:23.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0...")
     08:29  Never before has it been heard anywhere that an order from Yamaraja has been baffled. Therefore I think that people will have doubts about this that no one but you can eradicate. That is my firm conviction, kindly explain the reasons for these events diffhist −10 Nabakumar talk contribs
     03:14  Yamaraja also advised his servants never to approach the devotees. On the contrary, he instructed his messengers that if they meet a devotee they should offer their respectful obeisances diffhist +15 Nabakumar talk contribs

29 May 2024

28 May 2024

27 May 2024

25 May 2024

24 May 2024

23 May 2024

22 May 2024

17 May 2024

     10:45  Never before has it been heard anywhere that an order from Yamaraja has been baffled. Therefore I think that people will have doubts about this that no one but you can eradicate. That is my firm conviction, kindly explain the reasons for these events diffhist +12 Nabakumar talk contribs
N    03:15  If you argue that "What is the harm if I kill one animal, because it is said, na hanyate hanyamane sarire (BG 2.20): 'The living entity, soul, is never killed even after the annihilation of this body'?" that is all right. But you cannot force him‎‎ 3 changes history +3,351 [Soham‎ (3×)]
     
03:15 (cur | prev) +3 Soham talk contribs
     
03:14 (cur | prev) +3 Soham talk contribs
N    
03:14 (cur | prev) +3,345 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"If you argue that "What is the harm if I kill one animal, because it is said, na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre"|"The living entity, soul, is never killed even after the annihilation of this body'?" that is all right. But you cannot force him"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-05-17T03:14:39.000Z}} {{last|2024-05-17T03:14:39.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total...")

16 May 2024

N    18:47  You cannot get out the living entity, soul, by force from that body. Then you will be punishable. The living entity is never killed, but you have no right to get him out from that body. That is sinful diffhist +3,477 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"you cannot get out the living entity, soul, by force from that body. Then you will be punishable. The living entity is never killed, but you have no right to get him out from that body. That is sinful"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-05-16T18:47:00.000Z}} {{last|2024-05-16T18:47:00.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:You Canno...")

15 May 2024

14 May 2024

12 May 2024