View source for Ajna means one who has no sufficient knowledge. He is called ajna. And mudha means ass, rascal

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Ajñā means one who has no sufficient knowledge. He is called ajñā. And mūḍha means ass, rascal"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SharmisthaK}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2024-03-27T11:04:38.000Z}}
{{last|2024-03-27T11:04:38.000Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Meaning of Sanskrit Words]]
[[Category:One Who Has]]
[[Category:Not Sufficient]]
[[Category:No Knowledge]]
[[Category:Is Called...]]
[[Category:Mudha]]
[[Category:Ass]]
[[Category:Rascal]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SHARMISTHA]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Ajñā means one who has no sufficient knowledge. He is called ajñā. And mūḍha means ass, rascal. So in both the verses the Ajāmila is described as fool, rascal, and without sufficient knowledge. Why? Because he's attached to the child, and he does not know that death is coming now. Death is there. This is our position.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:760527 - Lecture SB 06.01.27 - Honolulu|760527 - Lecture SB 06.01.27 - Honolulu]]
</div>
<div class="text">
So in the previous verse also it has been described, bhojayan pāyayan mūḍho ([[Vanisource:SB 6.1.26|SB 6.1.26]]), and here is also, sa evaṁ vartamāno ajñā. Ajñā means one who has no sufficient knowledge. He is called ajñā. And mūḍha means ass, rascal. So in both the verses the Ajāmila is described as fool, rascal, and without sufficient knowledge. Why? Because he's attached to the child, and he does not know that death is coming now. Death is there. This is our position. We say that "God is dead." God is not dead. God is coming very soon. Wait a few years, you'll be dead. This is the position. You rascal, God is not dead. God is coming to kick you, to kill you. (laughter) Yes. Kṛṣṇa says, mṛtyuḥ sarva-haraś cāham ([[Vanisource:BG 10.34 (1972)|BG 10.34]]). What is death? Just like in your previous life you had been something. Death means you have forgotten everything. Suppose I was a very big king or prime minister or president. But that is all finished. Now I've got another life, another chapter of life. Tathā dehāntara-prāptir ([[Vanisource:BG 2.13 (1972)|BG 2.13]]). You have to change your body. It may be lower degree or higher degree, but you have to change your body. There are 8,400,000 species of life, forms of life. You have to accept one of them. That is our real problem. If we forget the real problem and blindly or foolishly say that "God is dead . . ." God may be dead, but God's law is not dead. Suppose a king dies, a president dies; does it mean the government dies? Huh? The government will go on. You can say, "God is dead." God is not dead, neither you are dead. But if you foolishly say that God is dead, that does not mean His law is also dead. The law will go on. One king may be dead; the next, his son or somebody will become king, and the government law will go on. So what is the use of talking foolishly like "God is dead. God may be dead?" God is never dead. This is going on. This morning we were talking.

So we are concerned with the laws of God. God may be dead or alive—it doesn't matter. Suppose by law we are prisoners, we are in the prison house, and all of a sudden the president or the king dies. Does it mean you shall be free? No. You have to rot. Just like Bengali proverb says raja morle rajya atakay na, (if the King dies, his country won't be stopped,) that if the king dies, his government is not stopped. We should remember that. That government is prakṛti, the material nature. Prakṛteḥ kriyamāṇāni guṇaiḥ karmāṇi sarvaśaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 3.27 (1972)|BG 3.27]]). You are reading Bhagavad-gītā. So this is . . . these are all foolish things, that "God is dead," "I don't care for God." But God, actually, God is not dead—you are dead.
</div>
</div>
</div>