View source for We forget this material nonsense. That's all. But don't forget ourself. Our identity is there. We are all servants of God, Krsna dasa. And this is real ego. So ego is not dissolved. Ego is there, but it is purified

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"We forget this material nonsense. That's all. But don't forget ourself. Our identity is there. We are all servants of God, Krsna dasa. And this is real ego. So ego is not dissolved. Ego is there, but it is purified"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Krsnadas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|19Jun12}}
{{last|19Jun12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Forget]]
[[Category:this]]
[[Category:material]]
[[Category:nonsense]]
[[Category:That's All]]
[[Category:but]]
[[Category:Never Forget]]
[[Category:Ourself]]
[[Category:our]]
[[Category:identity]]
[[Category:Is There]]
[[Category:We Are All]]
[[Category:Servant of God]]
[[Category:this Is]]
[[Category:Real Ego]]
[[Category:ego]]
[[Category:is Not]]
[[Category:Dissolve]]
[[Category:but]]
[[Category:it Is]]
[[Category:Purified]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Sri_Caitanya-caritamrta_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="3" parent="Lectures" text="Sri Caitanya-caritamrta Lectures"><h3>Sri Caitanya-caritamrta Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonCCAdilila7109114SanFranciscoFebruary201967_0" class="quote" parent="Sri_Caitanya-caritamrta_Lectures" book="Lec" index="36" link="Lecture on CC Adi-lila 7.109-114 -- San Francisco, February 20, 1967" link_text="Lecture on CC Adi-lila 7.109-114 -- San Francisco, February 20, 1967">
<div class="heading">We always remember that we are servants of God. We don't forget. We forget this material nonsense. That's all. But don't forget ourself. Our identity is there. We are all servants of God, Kṛṣṇa dāsa. And this is real ego. So ego is not dissolved. Ego is there, but it is purified.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on CC Adi-lila 7.109-114 -- San Francisco, February 20, 1967|Lecture on CC Adi-lila 7.109-114 -- San Francisco, February 20, 1967]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Woman: If someone who does not believe in scriptures, um, what is his duty, and...?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: His duty is to go to hell. One who does not believe in scriptures, they are meant for going to hell.</p>
<p>Woman: What can one do to rectify his offenses? (?)</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Well, just come... (break) That will help you.</p>
<p>Woman: But if a person is not willing to do that, is there any way... (static)</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Oh, how can you do that? If a person is not willing to take medicine, how he can be cured? He'll go to death. He must be willing to. That is a, I mean to say, explained in the Bhagavad-gītā. So that is very dangerous position, one who does not take care. Suppose if one wants to be educated without going to school. How it is possible? If somebody says, "Oh, I don't care for any school, colleges. I'll be educated at home," this is nonsense. Is it possible? Or will anybody recognize you? Then what is the use? Waste of time. That is the disease. Everyone thinks, "Oh, I am everything. I am perfect." That is the disease, material disease. Everyone is thinking, "I am independent. I am perfect. Whatever I think, oh, that is all right." This is going on. First of all, if anyone wants advancement, he must first of all think just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu is pretending, that "My spiritual master found Me a great fool ([[Vanisource:CC Adi 7.71|CC Adi 7.71]])." So one must agree to become a great fool and study these scriptures from bona fide spiritual master. Then there is hope of advancement. Yes?</p>
<p>Guest (1): (static) ...your description of the impersonalist philosophers does not correspond..., it's happening, say, by themselves they make a distinction how those things make... (static) ...a part of that philosophy that seems crucial to extending it, and that is sometimes called the "little self" and the "big self," the "big self" being the person who we are—personality, ego—and the other type of ego is the actual ego. And when one's ego is dissolved, he will wake up, as it were. As, like you wake up out of a dream and you find that you thought you were one of the characters in the dream while you were dreaming, when you wake up you realize that you didn't have this limited identity. You had a greater identity which encompassed all the characters in the dream.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Where you lose your personality? Either in dream or in awakened, you are person. When do you lose your personality? When you become imperson?</p>
<p>Guest (1): When do you lose it? When you wake up from the dream of this material world.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: You are not imperson at that time. You are person. You are thinking, "I was dreaming." So your ego is there.</p>
<p>Guest (1): Yeah...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Then how...?</p>
<p>Guest (1): Well, they say...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Where do you lose your ego? Where your ego is dissolved?</p>
<p>Guest (1): Where is it dissolved?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes? It is never dissolved.</p>
<p>Guest (1): It is dissolved into a finer form of consciousness.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, finer... Just now, your example: you were dreaming. Now you are awakening. You are now seeing, "Oh, I was dreaming." So the same person who was dreaming and who is thinking that "I was dreaming"—the same person. Where your identity is dissolved? In both the cases, you are standing, "I." This is...</p>
<p>Guest (1): Yeah, but they say at the next awakening you dissolve this "I."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: This "I" is..., this "I" is not in dream. That is the difference. The "I" in dream and "I" in not-dream, but "I" is there. Where is your "I" dissolved?</p>
<p>Guest (1): Well, when you're chanting it's dissolved, actually.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Never.</p>
<p>Guest (1): Forget yourself?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No. We don't forget. We always remember that we are servants of God. We don't forget. We forget this material nonsense. That's all. But don't forget ourself. Our identity is there. We are all servants of God, Kṛṣṇa dāsa. And this is real ego. So ego is not dissolved. Ego is there, but it is purified. It is purified. Yes?</p>
<p>Kīrtanānanda: Well, er, it's so difficult to control the senses. So we're engaging all of our senses in chanting and dancing and so forth. Now, the thinking mind is most difficult. So we can engage that in thinking of Kṛṣṇa. So...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Well, when you are chanting, that is thinking, practically thinking. When you are chanting, you are practically thinking. When you are cooking, it is practically thinking. You are cooking for Kṛṣṇa. You are typing for Kṛṣṇa. You are chanting Kṛṣṇa's name.</p>
<p>Kīrtanānanda: But there seems to be also a stage of not thinking. Is that... When one is chanting, should they not think or should they think of Kṛṣṇa?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no. Not thinking is not there. Thinking of Kṛṣṇa. Hare Kṛṣṇa means thinking of Kṛṣṇa and His energy. There is no question of destruction. It is purification. The psychic power—thinking, feeling and willing—is purified. Tat-paratvena nirmalam. Nirmalam means purified. But it is not lost. It is not lost. Purified. And when it is purified, hṛṣīkena hṛṣīkeśa-sevanaṁ bhaktir ucyate ([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 19.170|CC Madhya 19.170]]), with that purified sense, purified mind, when you apply it for Kṛṣṇa, that is called bhakti, Kṛṣṇa consciousness.</p>
<p>Bhaktijana: Can you ever lose your identity?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Evolute? What is that?</p>
<p>Kīrtanānanda: Can you ever lose your identity?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: What is that? What does it mean?</p>
<p>Rūpānuga: Can you ever lose your "I," the sense of "I"?</p>
<p>Bhaktijana: Can I ever forget myself?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: How you can forget yourself?</p>
<p>Guest (2): Not self.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: You cannot forget. You simply purify it. In diseased condition, your identification of "I" is different. Sometimes you are in convulsion. You forget... Rather, that is forgetfulness. Sometimes if we are, I mean to say, deranged in brain, we forget everything of our relationship. But when you are cured, you remember, "Oh, I was forgetful in my that delusion. Yes." So your "I" is always there. This "I," this "I," remembering, is purified. So ego has to be purified. Ego has not to be killed. And that cannot be killed, na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre ([[Vanisource:BG 2.20|BG 2.20]]), because it is eternal. How can you kill ego? It is not possible. So you have to purify your ego. The difference between is between false ego and real ego. Just like ahaṁ brahmāsmi, aham... "I am Brahman." Oh, this is also ego. This is, this Vedic version that "I am Brahman. I am not this matter," so this ego is purified ego, that "I am this." So that "I" is always there. Either in illusion or delusion or dream or in healthy stage, the "I" is always there.</p>
<p>Bhaktijana: When you're typing, should you think of Kṛṣṇa first and your typing second?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Well, when you type, at least in our Society, whenever we type, we type something which is describing Kṛṣṇa's form, quality, beauty. We are typing this. We are not typing any business letter or any political propaganda. We are typing, "Oh, Kṛṣṇa is so beautiful. Kṛṣṇa says like this. Kṛṣṇa told Prahlāda like that. Prahlāda told Kṛṣṇa like that." Everything Kṛṣṇa. As you are chanting Hare Kṛṣṇa, that (makes typewriter sound:) "cut, cut, cut" is also "Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa."</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>