As you say the waves of the creations are the different aspects, why a particular type of waves namely the mankind should be partially selected and offered services and why other types of waves such as the beasts or birds, the plants and the stone shall not be offered a similar type of services? In that case how can you say that the worship of a stone is sinful while a man who is more than a stone shall be considered as the object of love? These are some of the questions that arise out of a critical study of your book.
If you so desire I can enter into discussions about it and my opinion is that your approach is partial and unscientific. There is no hesitation to accept the principle of the Religion of Love because the Absolute Truth is, as we have known, Godhead Who is Sat, Chit and Ananda. Without Ananda there cannot be any Love that is an accepted fact. Your delineation of society, friendship and love among the human beings is based on this Ananda portion only but you have avoided the other portions of eternity and cognition of God the Whole soul. Thus the approach is partial and unscientific. The true religion of love is perfectly inculcated in the Bhagvat Geeta. When we speak of love there must be the object of love and the lover too. Here in this world we find that the object of love and the lover both are the cheater and the cheated in their reciprocal dealings. That is our experience. But the ultimate end being one Whole Soul, the dual existence of the object of Lover and the Loved loses identity. In that case the eternity and cognisibility of the Loved and Lover vanish at once. In this way there arises many questions which may be put forward to you for further discussions to adjust your ideas of religion.