View source for A person does not have illicit sex. That does not mean he has no sexual capacity. He has full sexual capacity, but he does not want to do it unless it is required for certain purpose

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"a person does not have illicit sex. That does not mean he has no sexual capacity. He has full sexual capacity, but he does not want to do it unless it is required for certain purpose"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Krsnadas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|13Nov12}}
{{last|13Nov12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:person]]
[[Category:Does Not]]
[[Category:Not Have]]
[[Category:Illicit Sex]]
[[Category:Does Not Mean]]
[[Category:have No]]
[[Category:sexual]]
[[Category:capacity]]
[[Category:full]]
[[Category:Do Not Want]]
[[Category:do]]
[[Category:unless]]
[[Category:require]]
[[Category:certain]]
[[Category:purpose]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1966 - 1977]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, 1969]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - Lectures, Srimad-Bhagavatam]]
[[Category:Prabhupada Speaks - in Europe, England - London]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="11" parent="Lectures" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures"><h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureLondonSeptember141969_0" class="quote" parent="General_Lectures" book="Lec" index="60" link="Lecture -- London, September 14, 1969" link_text="Lecture -- London, September 14, 1969">
<div class="heading">A devotee should not be angry. But that does not mean that he has lost his capacity of anger. No. Everything is there. Just like a person does not have illicit sex. That does not mean he has no sexual capacity. He has full sexual capacity, but he does not want to do it unless it is required for certain purpose.
</div>


<mp3player>https://vanipedia.s3.amazonaws.com/clip/690914SB-LONDON_clip02.mp3</mp3player>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture -- London, September 14, 1969|Lecture on SB 05.05.02 -- London, September 14, 1969]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">
So a spiritual master or a representative of Kṛṣṇa or ''mahātmā'', he is ''praśāntā''. ''Praśāntā'' means he is freed from all these manufacturing process of the mind. He is no more conducted by the dictation of the mind; he is conducted by the dictation of Kṛṣṇa, or Kṛṣṇa's words. Just like ''Bhagavad-gītā'', Kṛṣṇa's words. Kṛṣṇa and Kṛṣṇa's words are not different. So if you abide by the words of Kṛṣṇa, just like ''Bhagavad-gītā''—there are many others—then you are abiding by Kṛṣṇa. You are not abiding by the dictation of your mind. That should be the motto of our life. And a spiritual master or ''mahātmā'' is he who is situated in that position. He is not dictated by the mind. He is simply following the scriptural injunction. Therefore he is ''praśāntā''. ''Sama-cittāḥ praśāntāḥ''. 

And ''vimanyavaḥ''. ''Vimanyavaḥ'' means without any anger. Anger . . . a devotee should not be angry. But that does not mean that he has lost his capacity of anger. No. Everything is there. Just like a person does not have illicit sex. That does not mean he has no sexual capacity. He has full sexual capacity, but he does not want to do it unless it is required for certain purpose. That example is given: just like the tortoise. The tortoise, as soon as he likes, he opens his different limbs from the body, and as soon as he does not like, immediately winds within the body. So we should be like that. That is real control.

So ''vimanyavaḥ'' means that devotee does not generally become angry. But that does not mean that he has lost his power of becoming angry. No. He can become angry at any time, when it is required. And when he should be angry? He is angry, ''"krodha"'' ''bhakta-dveṣi janam''. He'll be angry when there is somebody who's against God and God's devotee. He should be angry. As soon as one says, blaspheming that, "I am God. There is no God," immediately he should be very angry because he is preaching false things. He's blaspheming against the Supreme Lord, that he is making God as very cheap. He should be very angry. ''Bhakta-dveṣi''. 

Just like our student Govinda dāsī in Hawaii. In a meeting she became very angry when the so-called incarnation of God and God . . . perhaps you know this incident. And the people did not say, of course, Govinda dāsī, but they hurt her husband, Gaurasundara. But she became very angry that, "These rascals," and so many things she spoke. (chuckles) So she did right, like a heroine. I very much liked it. So we should be very much angry. When? When there is anything against God and God's devotee. But generally, for my personal interest, I should not be angry. "All right, if you like to call me by ill names, I don't mind. You go on with your business." I do not become angry. 

So just like Hanumānjī, Vajrāṅgajī. Vajrāṅgajī, he set fire in the kingdom of Rāvaṇa. A very beautiful kingdom, almost made of all gold, but he set fire in that capital of Laṅka. He became very angry. But why he became angry? Not for his personal interest. But he was angry for the interest of Lord Rāma. Sītā, the Lakṣmī, wife of Lord Rāma, was kidnapped by this man Rāvaṇa, and he was very angry that, "He has kidnapped my Lord's spiritual energy, Sītā. I shall set fire in his very valuable capital." So this anger, this demonstration of anger and setting fire, was accepted as service.

So we should know where to be angry.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>