Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia


Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge


Special

Related changes

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide anonymous users | Hide my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits
Show new changes starting from 19:50, 24 April 2024
   
 
Page name:
List of abbreviations:
N
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m
This is a minor edit
b
This edit was performed by a bot
(±123)
The page size changed by this number of bytes

23 April 2024

22 April 2024

     15:46  Actually, the explanation of this mantra (Bhagavad-gita 12.5) and of practically all the mantras of the Vedic hymns is summarized in the Vedanta-sutra and properly explained in Srimad-Bhagavatam diffhist +20 Rahul talk contribs
     15:10  Actually the demigods, they cannot accept anything from you. But the sacrificer, he approaches a demigod for quick result for material benefit and these things will be explained in the Eighth Chapter of the Bhagavad-gita diffhist +27 Rahul talk contribs
     14:05  The new Sixth Canto Bhagavatams are very nice. Yes, actually they are worshipable Deities diffhist −14 Visnu Murti talk contribs
     12:50  The general populace calls me highly educated, - Sanatana Gosvami told the Lord, - and I am such a fool that I actually believe them‎‎ 2 changes history +48 [Nabakumar‎ (2×)]
     
12:50 (cur | prev) +43 Nabakumar talk contribs
     
12:50 (cur | prev) +5 Nabakumar talk contribs
     12:46  Sanatana Gosvami was born in a very respectable brahmana family, but because he accepted the service of Muhammadan king, actually he lost his all brahminical culture. He did not lose, but superficially it appeared diffhist −21 Nabakumar talk contribs
     09:56  Actually your (Sanatana's) body is transcendental, never material. You are thinking of it, however, in terms of a material conception diffhist −11 Nabakumar talk contribs
     09:56 Move log Nabakumar talk contribs moved page Actually your body is transcendental, never material. You are thinking of it, however, in terms of a material conception to Actually your (Sanatana's) body is transcendental, never material. You are thinking of it, however, in terms of a material conception
     09:45  Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu said that actually the aroma of his (Sanatana Gosvami's) body was the excellent scent of a mixture of sandalwood pulp, camphor, musk and aguru diffhist +19 Nabakumar talk contribs

21 April 2024

     17:53  The Nagapatnis said, "Although You have expanded into the three principal deities of this universe - namely Brahma, Visnu and Siva - for creation, maintenance and destruction, Your appearance as Visnu is actually for the benediction of living creatures" diffhist +32 Sunnanya talk contribs
     12:57  Although Sanatana Goswami was known by the masses of people as a greatly learned man (and actually he was a highly learned Sanskrit scholar), and although he accepted this designation, he did not actually know what his constitutional position really was diffhist +13 Nabakumar talk contribs
     10:24  Actually I (Sanatana Gosvami) do not know how to inquire about the goal of life and the process for obtaining it. Being merciful upon me, please explain all these truths diffhist +90 Nabakumar talk contribs

20 April 2024

     18:27  Lord Sri Krsna was not that type of incarnation. He was actually the Personality of Godhead from the very beginning of His appearance. He appeared before His so-called mother as four-armed Visnu diffhist +50 Sunnanya talk contribs
N    09:47  Actually the supreme father is Krsna. Therefore He says, aham bija-pradah pita. So Krsna is for everyone. Krsna is not monopolized. This is a wrong theory, "He is a Hindu god." No diffhist +2,894 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Actually the supreme father is Kṛṣṇa. Therefore He says, ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā. So Kṛṣṇa is for everyone. Kṛṣṇa is not monopolized. This is a wrong theory, "He is a Hindu god." No"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-04-20T09:47:40.000Z}} {{last|2024-04-20T09:47:40.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Actual...")

19 April 2024

     15:39  Maharaja Pariksit was actually an ideal saintly king because while touring his kingdom he happened to see that a poor cow was about to be killed by the personified Kali, whom he at once took to task as a murderer diffhist +16 Visnu Murti talk contribs
     15:11  Sanatana Gosvami prayed for the Lord's confirmation that His teachings would actually evolve in his heart by His grace. Otherwise Sanatana knew that there was no possibility of his being able to describe the Lord's teachings diffhist +97 Rahul talk contribs
     12:03  Actually, in the sacrifices the slaughtered animals were given a new life, but people without such powers were taking advantage of such Vedic rituals and unnecessarily killing poor animals diffhist −13 Visnu Murti talk contribs
N    08:26  The two things are there: the divine characteristic and the demonic characteristic. Both of them are there; now you have to select which one you want. If you actually want to love Krsna, then take this divine characteristic diffhist +3,268 Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the two things are there: the divine characteristic and the demonic characteristic. Both of them are there; now you have to select which one you want. If you actually want to love Kṛṣṇa, then take this divine characteristic"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2024-04-19T08:26:51.000Z}} {{last|2024-04-19T08:26:51.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc...")

18 April 2024